Now that he
Mood:  irritated
Now Playing: We are supposed to drop this????? I don't think so....
Topic: More stupidity.....

Now that the time has come that John "Effing" Kerry says that he apologised, we are now, according to all the Democrats supposed to forget this and move on. Well, I don't think so, and I have seen only one other person ask the questions that need to be asked....and that person was Sean Hannity.

Why is it, that when a Republican does something wrong....an apology just isn't enough? Why is it when someone like Foley who after the allegations came out, that he had inappropriately messaged an underaged male page, and he resigned *in disgrace might I add* the democrats and the media just couldn't let it go? He apologised and it wasn't enough?
When Rush Limbaugh apologised for his comments about Michael J. Fox, *which by the way were not inappropriate cause I heard them while listening to his show, and the news media didn't get his comments right* the media and the Democrats just couldn't let that go??? Why when a democrat does something wrong...the media ignores it???

This double standard just has to stop. According to the Liberals in this country, we have two standards that we have to live by.

1. The Republicans are guilty of everything....go after them with gusto till they are ruined even if they apologise. (There are many instances of this one.) and


2. The Democrats are NOT guilty of anything and if by slim chance they are caught doing something stupid or wrong, all they have to do is apologise in any way, even if what they say isn't really an apology, and we have to let it go and stop with it.

Well, I for one will not. John Kerry did NOT apologise! He just said the words that he needed to, to make it alright in his eyes. He apologised to the Parents and the troops for his words, that in his words, 'were taken out of context and taken in a way he didn't mean them.'


Bull.....he meant to say every word he said, and he said every word the way it was meant to be...and his past speeches about how he feels for the military prove it. All you have to do is go back into his past, even earlier this year, and read what he has said about the military. None of it is good. He hates the military and he did NOT APOLOGISE!

Remember, this is the same man who accused our troops of raping and torturing women and children in the dead of night!

God Bless America.

God Bless our Troops



-Robert-

John Kerry really put his foot in it this time.....
Mood:  party time!
Now Playing: and now he's trying to backpeddle........
Topic: More stupidity.....

I was really surprised when John Kerry opened his mouth, and out came a stream of stupidity. Now don't get me wrong. I have never liked John Kerry...but these people are not stupid...even the Liberals. They have to have some smarts to be where they are. But saying that 'if you don't get a good education then you end up in Iraq,' insinuating that our troops are stupid, was one of the dumbest things I have ever heard the man utter, and he has said some really stupid things.

But, in saying what he did, he highlighted the stance of the Democratic party, that the military is not something that we need.

In the world today, our military is the reason that we are still a free society, and none of these men and women are stupid. None of them are to be considered dumb. In other words, MR JOHN KERRY, the stupid one is you, because you do not honor the men and women who are protecting your right to say such idiotic things. Thank you Mr. Kerry for the November surprise that will not only help the Republicans...but hurt your chances. And hurting your chances is just what I live for. Thank you.

But that isn't the last of it. This morning President Bush called for an apology from John Kerry, but if Mr. Kerry does not apologise, he will only be hurting his chances for the 2008 election, as well as the Democrats chances. I just heard on the news just a few seconds ago that John Kerry is NOT going to apologise for his comments. He said that he was not talking about our troops...but about President Bush....but if you listen to him saying that "if you don't get an education you will end up in Iraq" is not against Bush...it is saying the Troops are stupid. Shame on you John Kerry! Shame on you.

His stupidity, just showed America just how he stands when it comes to the military. He hates the military and doesn't want it to even exist. It is was up to him, the funding for our military would be cut as far as he could as president, which is something that in this world of Terrorists we do not want to have happen! So, like I have already said, thank you Mr Kerry for the nice November surprise. You have let all of America know just how you and your party stands on the subject of National Security......You don't!

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops

-Robert-

Lynne Cheney "BLITZED" Wolf Blitzer of CNN...........
Mood:  bright
Now Playing: Showing us what we should all do to them and the Liberals-PART ONE
Topic: What to do-PT 1

Following, on this post to my blog, is the complete interview on CNN with Wolf Blitzer and the Vice President’s wife, Lynne Cheney. I think that the GOP and the Republican politicians in Washington could learn a thing or two about the way that Mrs. Cheney took it to CNN and Wolf Blitzer, and how to run this country!

The held nothing back. She didn’t worry if her ratings were going to fall because of this....she didn’t care. She just wanted to get the truth out, no matter how someone might perceive it.......and that is what our politicians should start doing. This whole thing about being Politically Correct is bull and it should be treated as such. Who cares if one or two people out of a million think that we are doing the wrong thing? Isn’t this a country where the Majority is supposed to rule?

During the 70’ and 80’s we got ourselves so intrenched in the feelings of people that we started stepping on the majority of the people just to “not hurt the feelings of a few”.....and this has GOT TO STOP! Lynne Cheney did just this on Friday night when she was on CNN with Wolf Blitzer. Here is the whole interview, including what the video clips that were used during the interview said. This is long but a must read for anyone who hates what the left has done to the integrety of this great country........

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I'm also proud to be running with Dick Cheney. He's the finest vice president our country has ever had.

(APPLAUSE)

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: President Bush on the campaign trail in Nevada praising his vice president. Welcome back to "LATE EDITION."

Joining us now the vice president's wife, Lynne Cheney. She's no stranger, of course, to our viewers here on CNN. She's no stranger to politics and to policy, having once served of course as CNN's co-host of "Crossfire." Remember those days?

LYNNE CHENEY, DICK CHENEY'S WIFE: Exactly.

BLITZER: Mrs. Cheney, welcome back to "LATE EDITION." Thanks very much for joining us.

CHENEY: Good to be here. Thank you, Wolf.

BLITZER: All right. Let's get to the latest Time magazine poll that shows -- that asks this question, "Who would make a better president?" Edwards 47 percent, named by the Democratic candidate to be his running mate; Cheney, 38 percent. Your husband has been in office for almost four years now but Edwards by this poll number, with a sampling error of only 3 percent, suggests that more Americans believe that Edwards would be a better president.

CHENEY: Well, of course, Senator Edwards hasn't been in politics very long, and he certainly hasn't been on the national scene very long and Dick has. And one of the things that happens when you're part of national politics, when you're making decisions is that there are an awful lot of people who become instant critics. So I don't worry about that poll at all.

BLITZER: But the American public knows Dick Cheney, they don't know John Edwards that well yet, at least according to this poll, they think Edwards would be a better president.

CHENEY: Well, of course, when someone doesn't know you they don't have a chance to examine what other people say is your baggage. And I would say the Democrats have been pretty good at quite a lot of mudslinging over these past years and, you know, you pay a price for it in terms of the polls.

But that's not what is important, and it's not what is going to determine the election. What's going to determine this election is which ticket is really in step with the American voters.

BLITZER: Do you believe John Edwards is qualified to be president of the United States?

CHENEY: Well, look, I think he's a nice man. I think he has a nice family. I do think that he is out of the mainstream with most voters.

It's an odd ticket, you know, John Kerry, according to that National Journal survey, the most liberal member of the United States Senate, John Edwards, the fourth most liberal member of the United States Senate. I can't remember the Democrats ever nominating a ticket so far to the left before. So I think that is a real question that will deserve good debate in the upcoming months.

Notice the questioning here? See how he is trying to lead her into what he feels is where this interview is going to go? But you will notice, that she doens’t allow this to happen. And I think that is where most Republican policians make the mistake with the press...they allow the press to sway them to where the press wants them...not where they should be.....Lynne Cheney didn’t allow this and I think it really frustrated Mr. Wolf Blitzer......

BLITZER: Does that mean he's not qualified to become president?

CHENEY: Well, I just think he's out of the mainstream, and I think it is also unusual. I really thought the candidate was going to be Dick Gephardt, another very nice man but someone...

BLITZER: Would he have been qualified?

CHENEY: Well, Dick Gephardt is someone who has a long track record of experience in national politics, so we'll have a good debate over the issues in the months ahead.

BLITZER: All right, sounds like you have doubts of the qualifications...

CHENEY: We'll have a very, very good debate and a debate we're looking forward to.

BLITZER: A lot were surprised when the former Republican senator from New York state Al D'Amato had some political punditry, if you will, about the vice presidential slot on the Republican...

CHENEY: Wolf, this stuff isn't important. I mean, really, let's get...

BLITZER: Listen to what...

CHENEY: Let's get to things that are important. Let's get to the intelligence report. Let's get to the issue of values in this campaign. Stuff you're talking about is the brouhaha that goes on inside the Beltway.

BLITZER: We're going to those issues in a moment, but listen to what Al D'Amato said.

CHENEY: Al D'Amato. Now remind me who Al D'Amato is.

BLITZER: The former senator from New York state. Listen to this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ALFONSE D'AMATO, FORMER U.S. SENATOR: I think we could do better. There's no doubt in my mind that Secretary Colin Powell, if offered the job and really offered it, would take it and would change politics in America for the better.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: It's not just Al D'Amato. There are some other Republicans -- not many, but there are some others who think the president might want to change his running mate.

CHENEY: No, this is really -- this is a discussion that isn't going anywhere. The president has made his decision. Dick has accepted that it. That's the ticket.

And I think Al D'Amato also said nice things about the vice president. Maybe you should find those, too.

BLITZER: But he did say that maybe McCain or Powell might be a better running mate.

CHENEY: And they're great guys, but Dick is the candidate.

BLITZER: Listen to what the Democratic presidential candidate, John Kerry, in the current issue, the new issue of Time magazine says. He's referring to the vice presidential decision; the fact that Cheney is advising President Bush -- your husband. Listen to this. He says, "I don't think it has been properly utilized in this administration" -- the whole relationship between the president and the vice president. "I think it's been excessive, and I intend to be a president who is on top of what's happening in every regard. On final decisions I'm not going to be pushed into them the way I sense this president was." That's a tough statement regarding the vice president.

CHENEY: Well, you know it's a political time. John Kerry is going to say such things; so will John Edwards. It's not beanbag.

But the president has made the decisions in this administration, and that's the important thing to know.

I do have to smile a little bit at the idea -- I mean, this ticket is not going to win, but in some distant universe where they might win I can imagine where John Edwards' office will be. Will he be beyond the Old Executive Office Building? It sounds as though John Kerry doesn't have plans to utilize his vice president in the way I think you need to in this challenging world we're in.

I got to tell you, these are tough jobs. I got to tell you the American people face many challenges. This president and this vice president have been very good at meeting those challenges, both on the national security front and on the economic front.

BLITZER: Let's talk about national security. The Senate Intelligence Committee report, scathing this week I think by almost all accounts. Listen to what the Republican chairman, Pat Roberts, said in announcing the conclusions.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

SEN. PAT ROBERTS (R), KANSAS: Before the war the U.S. intelligence community told the president, as well as the Congress and the public, that Saddam Hussein had stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons and if left unchecked would probably have a nuclear weapon during this decade. Well, today we know these assessments were wrong.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: No one in this administration more than Dick Cheney has been outspoken in the rationale and the justification for going to war against Saddam Hussein.

Knowing what we know right now, based on the faulty intelligence, is it appropriate to reconsider that decision?

CHENEY: You know, I thought Senator Snowe did a fine job of explaining that -- you know, put the WMD aside. And this Senate report is very important; we need to go back and assess how we did and how we can do better in the future. But put that aside for a minute. You have a country, you have a regime, that have used weapons of mass destruction. Saddam had used chemical weapons.

BLITZER: (UNINTELLIGIBLE) late meetings?

CHENEY: You had -- same man, same country, used chemical weapons. He had sanctioned the presence of terrorists in his country. He had, after the Gulf War -- and you remember this well -- he had been much closer to developing an atomic weapon than we had thought so previously. He had a poisons factory, biological weapons in northern Iraq. He had terrorists present in the country. Abu Nidal was there, Palestinian Islamic Jihad was there. Al Qaeda was there.

It was the place where there was a nexus, a possible connection between terrorists and the weapons that we never want terrorists to have in their hands to use.

BLITZER: When you say al Qaeda was there, are you referring to Abu Musab al Zarqawi?

CHENEY: I'm referring to Zarqawi, yes.

BLITZER: But anyone else?

CHENEY: Well, there were -- Zarqawi was operating the poisons camp in northern Iraq from Baghdad. There's also the fact that Saddam was paying Palestinian terrorists $25,000 to kill Israelis, so...

BLITZER: To commit suicide.

CHENEY: This was a very bad regime.

As Senator Snowe said, you might have had a different paradigm for discussing this war but this is a war that was so -- we don't need to rethink this. Getting rid of Saddam has done the world a great deal of good.

It's also led us, and I haven't heard this discussed yet -- it's also, I think, helped us to get rid of the nuclear threat in Libya where Moammar Gadhafi, having seen our strong action in Baghdad, having seen our strong action in Iraq, has now given up his programs for weapons of mass destruction. They're all shipped to the United States.

BLITZER: So you have no second thoughts?

CHENEY: None, zero.

BLITZER: And as far as you know, and I'm sure you know, the vice president has no regrets about going to war?

CHENEY: He'll be glad to come on and talk to you about that.

BLITZER: I'll hold you to that.

CHENEY: Good.

BLITZER: I'll ask him to come out and talk to us.

CHENEY: That would be great.

BLITZER: Thanks very much.

Hold on one second. We're going to take a quick break. We have a lot more to talk about. Coming up, I'll continue our conversation with Lynne Cheney about what and who is going to make a difference in this election year. Plus a quick check of what's making headlines at this hour.

Stay with "LATE EDITION." We'll be right back.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

(NEWSBREAK)

BLITZER: Just ahead, more questions for Lynne Cheney, about politics, policy and history, all subjects very close to her heart.

"LATE EDITION" will be right back.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[END OF PART ONE]

Lynne Cheney
Mood:  bright
Now Playing: Showing us what we should all do to them and the Liberals
Topic: What to do-PT 2
[Start of Part 2]

BLITZER: Welcome back to "LATE EDITION."

We're continuing our conversation with Lynne Cheney. She is the wife, of course, of the vice president, Dick Cheney.

Mrs. Cheney, the White house, the Republicans now pushing an amendment in the U.S. Senate, debate starting tomorrow, that would have a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. I want you to listen to what your husband said four years ago on this sensitive subject.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

RICHARD B. CHENEY, VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: I think that means that people should be free to enter into any kind of relationship they want to enter into. It's really no one he's business in terms of trying to regulate or prohibit behavior in that regard.

I think different states are likely to come to different conclusions and that's appropriate. I don't think there should necessarily be a federal policy in this area.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: Now, I interviewed the vice president a few months ago, and he revised his position to say he supports the president when it comes to this issue. As the vice president he has no choice: He has to support the president.

But is this a good idea for a constitutional amendment to come forward that would ban same-sex marriage?

CHENEY: Well, I thought that the formulation he used in 2000 was very good. And first of all, to be clear that people should be free to enter into their relationships that they choose. And, secondly, to recognize what's historically been the situation, that when it comes to conferring legal status on relationships, that is a matter left to the states.

Of course, what's happened is we're in a situation now where the ability of the states to do that has been called into some question by the actions of the court in Massachusetts.

BLITZER: So you heard Olympia Snowe and Dianne Feinstein say it is a bad idea, even though they both said it's not a good idea to have same-sex marriage, to codify it into law, it's a bad idea to have a constitutional amendment, that's the nuance right there. That's the difference between the Kerry-Edwards position and the Bush-Cheney position.

CHENEY: I think that the constitutional amendment discussion will give us an opportunity to look for ways to discuss ways in which we can keep the authority of the states intact.

BLITZER: Well, and maybe I'm missing something.

CHENEY: No, I've answered the question twice, Wolf.

BLITZER: So your position is basically...

CHENEY: It's a good point for discussion.

BLITZER: Just leave it alone, and...

CHENEY: You bet. You bet.

BLITZER: ... and move on. This is obviously...

CHENEY: Thank you, Wolf.

BLITZER: ... a sensitive subject that all of us appreciate, you know, your position on this matter.

Let's talk a little bit about Ken Lay. Ken Lay indicted this week. We saw his picture in our going forward. There's some confusion or at least some question in there whether he played a significant role, if any role, in helping your husband come up with the energy task force recommend-ations. Based on what you know, did he?

CHENEY: I met Ken Lay once in passing. That's all I know. I can't help you, Wolf.

BLITZER: That's it?

CHENEY: Well, I just don't know anything.

BLITZER: All right. Let's move on.

CHENEY: It's always interesting in Washington to pretend you know things when you don't, but I found that it's not usually a good idea.

BLITZER: If you don't know you just say it. I don't know.

CHENEY: Yes. "I don't know," is the answer.

BLITZER: All right. Let's move on and talk about a subject close to your heart, the books, the history books that have won the new prize and I want to go through -- the first one, "An American Plague." That's the main reason why you wanted to come on the program.

CHENEY: That's why I'm here.

BLITZER: Right now to talk about this new book by Jim Murphy, "An American Plague," that won the prize for school kids, whether elementary or middle or high school.

CHENEY: This is middle school kids and up.

BLITZER: And tell us why you picked this book -- and we're showing the book jacket on our screen.

CHENEY: Well, I have a very distinguished committee that helps in picking this book. Hugh Sidey was on the book selection committee this year, and I have wonderful historians on the larger committee, David McCullough, Ken Burns, so it's not just my selection, but this book just naturally gravitated to the top.

It's a wonderful story about a crisis in Philadelphia in 1793, when yellow plague struck and about the heroes that stepped forward to meet the crisis. And among them were the members of the free African- American community.

We gave the award to Jim Murphy, the author of this book, at Mother Bethel AME Church in Philadelphia, which was founded by one of the leaders of the free African community, who was also instrumental in bringing help to the sick and dying.

People were leaving the city and the free African-Americans were willing to go nurse people. They were taking care of orphans. It is a story of true heroism that little kids will love to have read to them, middle school and high school kids...

BLITZER: The 2004 James Madison Book Award.

CHENEY: ... really be brought into it.

BLITZER: All right. Let's talk about the others, not the winners but there were some others that were excellent as well. Give me a quick sentence on each one on as we go through them, why these books are so good. "Shutting Out the Sky," by Deborah Hopkinson.

CHENEY: This is a story of immigrants who came to this country from the late 1890s to the first decade of the 20th century about how grim their lives were and yet how also opportunity was open to them in this wonderful country.

BLITZER: "Duel of the Ironclads," by Patrick O'Brien.

CHENEY: Oh, wow, this is a book boys will love. It's about, you know, putting iron on ships for the first time. And these two ships fight, and nothing is resolved, neither wins. But the whole course of naval history is changed. Wooden ships after that would be of no good.

BLITZER: Some girls will like that book as well.

CHENEY: Well, I have to just confess, though, that little boys have been taking it off the shelf, but girls will like it. You're right.

BLITZER: "Ben Franklin's Almanac," by Candace Fleming.

CHENEY: This presents in almanac form the story of Ben Franklin's life. Wonderful use of period illustrations, great prose, really interesting book.

BLITZER: This is a weird title but you'll explain it: "Mack Made Movies," by Don Brown.

CHENEY: This is the story of Mack Sennett. This is a picture book for little kids, wonderfully illustrated about Mack Sennett, the Keystone Kops, he was there at the beginning of the motion picture industry.

Kids will like it because it talks about something they know, and tells them the history of it.

BLITZER: These are books that all of our young kids should read.
If you love American history, these are books that you strongly recommend.

CHENEY: I have been so happy to see the really good writing that's going on, and really gratified to be able to present awards.

BLITZER: Let me ask one final question, unrelated, a sensitive subject once again.

When John Kerry used the "f" word in an interview in Rolling Stone magazine, shortly thereafter Andy Card, the White House chief of staff, was on this show, and I want you to listen to what he said to me when -- and I confronted him, when I asked him to react to John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate, using that word. Listen to this.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

ANDREW CARD, WHITE HOUSE CHIEF OF STAFF: Well, I've known John Kerry for a long time, and I'm very disappointed that he would use that kind of language. That's beneath John Kerry, and I'm disappointed that he did it.
BLITZER: And do you think he should -- what do you think he should do?
CARD: Well, I'm hoping that he's apologizing, at least to himself, because that's not the John Kerry that I know.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

BLITZER: Now, I've known the vice president for many years, going back to when I was the Pentagon correspondent, and when I heard that he used that word in that exchange with Senator Leahy, I was pretty surprised.

You know him a lot better than I do: Were you that surprised?

CHENEY: Well, it's very unusual, Wolf, but he was sorely tried, if I may say so, by someone attacking his integrity and then pretending to be his best friend. I think that's what set it off.

But I am glad you brought up the fact that -- you know, the way Dick did it, it was a private comment. You wouldn't know it from the amount of publicity that it's garnered, but John Kerry used the same word in an on-the-record interview about the president of the United States.

So, I'm gratified that you would bring that up, because it hasn't been paid much attention to. It doesn't look at least that way from my perspective.

BLITZER: Did you take him to the woodshed a little bit?

CHENEY: No, I really didn't. I mean, he is such a good man, and more likely to say, "Put a sock in it," you know, if he's really tried.

So, you know, I can understand, when people are pushed to extremes, that in a private setting they might say something unusual.

BLITZER: How's he feeling?

CHENEY: He's great, thanks.

BLITZER: Everything is OK?

CHENEY: Everything's great.

BLITZER: Lynne Cheney, I hope you'll come back.

CHENEY: It's my pleasure. Thanks, Wolf.

BLITZER: Thanks very much for joining us.

CHENEY: Good to be here.

BLITZER: No stranger to CNN, Lynne Cheney. And just ahead, new warnings of possible terrorist plans to disrupt this year's election here in the United States. We'll ask two members of the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee, Chris Cox and Jane Harman, how they view the risks. How worried should Americans be right now?

"LATE EDITION," the last word in Sunday talk, will be right back.

With that the interivew ended, with "the last word in Sunday talk....." but it seems to me that Lynne Cheney was the one to get the last word in......and I loved it. She went right at them in a way that the politicians won't do. I have a feeling that Wolf Blitzer will not be having her back on his show anytime soon, cause she really cleaned his clock! It's about time someone did. And I hope this treatment of the press and the media is contagious.....cause it is so needed....and more often too.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops

-Robert-

The Jihad against the West.....and others...
Mood:  chillin'
Now Playing: The Real Threats, and what to do about them....
Topic: What to do.....

The Real Threat here comes actually from three distinct sources. And I will name them off here and then go into what can be done to stop this trend that will eventually destroy America.......

Number 1: The Islamic Facists, are the ones that have decided that they are the right way and they will murder, torture and/or mutilate ANYONE who does not believe as they do. Now I have to say this. This means US people! If they are willing to kill by any means the Muslims who are more "kin" to them than almost anyone, then you gotta know that they harbor no warm and fuzzy feelings for us, and the other free people of the world. They would, and do, kill us and any other free people of the world to get their point across and to get rid of anyone who doesn't believe as they do. They will kill, behead, or torture anyone who doesn't believe as they do, and they will video tape it so the whole world can see, just like the Nazi's in World War II did when they filmed the extermination of millions of Jews in the death camps. These people who do this are evil. There is no other word for it.

Number 2: This group belongs to the Liberals. And we all can name off a littany of them. The trouble is, they are not considered our enemy. A lot of them hold power in our own goverment. People who would rather coddle the enemy than kill them. People who want us to lose, and the enemy to win. People who have been working in our government for decades, just to weaken our nation. People who work in our government to over tax the American people so they can live the cushy lifestyle that they have grown accustomed too. People who care nothing for the freedoms of the American people....just so long as they get what they want. People who don't care about the laws of this country, cause a lot of them only get in their way. People like John Kerry who believes the best in our enemy and the worst of our troops. People like Nancy Palosi who wants to be the speaker of the house so badly that she doesn't care what she, or the Democrats do to this country, just so long as she gets what she wants. So she can raise taxes, and cut funding off for the war so we lose another one! To heck with our nations safety! People like Dick Durbin who believes that President Bush went into this war only for oil....that there were no WMD's even though some were found....

People like these, and several others that are hardly worth the effort to mention, though I have named them all here before.

Number 3: These are the ones who say they agree with the president and with what we have to say, but still want us to "Cut and Run" like the Demcrats do. John McCain comes to mind in this group. He doesn't agree with Bush on national security, and has fought Bush's stance on the illegal immigration thing all the way. Since these people broke the laws of this nation in the way they came here, they don't deserve anything but the consequences of breaking our laws. They deserve nothing less!

The other day, I heard that Mexico (and their President) were gathering the signatures of other nations to stop us from building the wall along our southern border. ARE THEY FREAKING INSANE?

They, (the Mexican government) do not want us going to Mexico, unless it's the legal way, but they want us to leave our borders wide open for them and/or anyone else to cross anytime they so please! Look at the audacity of them demanding us to leave our borders open, and you will see just where the Democrats and their stupid Politically Correct crap have gotten us. You should now see where their stupid rhetoric is taking this country. Right down the toilet!

And, if that isn't bad enough, for those of you who do not realise this, the Terrorists, the Jihad, and the Islamic Facists are watching this coming election with great interest. They know that if the Democrats win this election, and gain back the majority in the house and the Senate, that President Bush will probably be impeached *unrightfully so*, they will know, that they will have won the war on terror, and then we will be bringing our troops home in defeat, because they (the Democrats) will cut the funding for the war and it will then be another war that will be lost to us. Once that happens, the enemy then can contact all the Terrorist cells that they have residing here in the US and call them to action......and then, we will be in a real pickle because we will then have to fight for our very existance, when we wouldn't have had to do it at all. At least not here.

We have to listen to our troops over there. Not the one or two that are unhappy about what we are doing there....but the majority of the troops there. A lot have gone over there more than once. They feel the war is worth what they are sacrificing their lives for. They feel that we have to win this war....there, not here. We need to listen to the people that count......not the ones that don't.

God Bless America
God Bless Our Troops

-Robert-

This Michael J. Fox thing is totally out of hand...
Mood:  celebratory
Now Playing: Why don't people LISTEN TO WHAT IS ACTUALLY SAID!!
Topic: Time to Reform.....

I have listened to Rush Limbaugh over this last week, and I have heard everything he has said on the subject of Michael J. Fox.

Now, I have always liked Mr. Fox, and have nothing against him, but when he does total political ads telling lies about things that can't be taken back....then I draw the line.

He is doing that commercial *which has been pulled by the way* so it was never shown during the World Series like it was supposed to have been. But here is some of what happened.



Mr Limbaugh was asked to respond to Michael J. Fox's interview on Katie Couric's news the other night, because he said two "incredible" things that he felt he had to respond to. He also posted it.

Thanks, Katie, I'll try to make it simple:

I believe Democrats have a long history of using victims of various things as POLITICAL spokespeople because they believe they are untouchable, infallible. They are immune from criticism. But when anyone enters the POLITICAL arena of ideas they forfeit the right to be challenged on their participation and message.

I have not met Mr. Fox, do not know him. I have admired his work in film and TV and his appearances on Letterman were howlers. I have nothing personal against him. But I believe his implication that only Democrats want to cure disease(s) is irresponsible (as I believed about John Edwards assuring voters Christopher Reeve would walk if only John Kerry were elected). I think this is ultimately cruel and gives people who suffer these terrible afflictions false hope.

As of now there is NO EVIDENCE that embryonic stem cells even hold promise, while other approaches, such as adult stem cells, already have yielded results. Michael's TV spots mislead and misinform on this. (You might ask him about the gene therapy research at a Chicago hospital which has produced encouraging results on Parkinson's patients. A VIRUS is inserted in the gene, which is then inserted in the brain. The Michael J. Fox Foundations has committed $1.9 million to further research on this...story from earlier this month.)

I did NOT mock or make fun of Mr. Fox. I have seen him many times on TV but never have I seen him as he appears in the ads. I read from his own book that he will not take his medications before certain appearances (Senate, 1999) in order to illustrate the ravages of Parkinson's, which I understand and applaud. So the concept of manipulating meds has been stated by Mr. Fox, which is what caused me to question his appearance in his ads.

He is stumping for Democrats, in the political arena, and is therefore open to analysis and criticism as we all are. His suffering is NOT fair game and I am sorry if people drew that conclusion about my comments, but I believe this happens precisely because NO criticism of victims is ever allowed, at all, which as I say is the Democrat strategy in putting them forward.

Now I have to say, upon reading that, I understand what Rush was saying. Why didn't Katie use more than one line of that when it was presented to her? She most likely used the most damning line there, and all by itself, gave rise to another "Rush is bad because he is against Michael J. Fox conspiracy". And that is just what I believe it is....

The news media, and I include Katie Couric on this is strictly liberal to the core and would not know the truth if it came up and bit them on the butt. And if they do know the truth, then they don't like it and make sure that it is always changed so that it says what they like. People, the media has been doing this kind of thing for decades now. They are good at it, and they think that no matter what kind of lie they push forward, they can get away with it, because they are the PRESS and the press pushes forth the truth. HAAA!!!! Their truth and reality are two complete different things and they would probably explode with a cosmic destructive force if they met. The press does not know the truth.

The press of years ago, where something like I heard my dad say early in my life, that the press didn't lie, is now a myth that they perpetuate with every sleasy story that they put forth.

I am getting tired of them acting like the news is theirs to tell the way they want it. I am getting tired of them telling news, not the way it actually happened, but the way that is sensationalized and false. They care nothing except for the ratings that their news stories can get for them....nothing more....nothing less. And doing the news that way, they are missing out on the real news of this great country. And that is that we are tired of their lies, just like we are tired of the Liberals lies...and we are going to do something about it!

I got a comment the other day on my web site linked with this blog, where someone wrote me in my guestbook, that said: "I'm glad you think it's okay to go kill 655,000 Iraqis based on misinformation and bad intel. I can't wait to see how much crying you do when Bush/Cheney are impeached after the Democrats take back Congress. You can't suppress the truth forever. This Administration is about to come tumbling down, as all evil regimes do. God Bless America!"

Now I almost laughed when I read that, because that story, which the news media jumped on, was proved false, and I wrote this person an email letting him know the falsness of his statement and the things that were actually happening because he didn't know. He is probably a clone of the Liberal establishment that doesn't get any of his news except through ABC CBS and NBC and the New York Times or something like that. He in other words is being fed a line of bull that could feed the entire world for ten years if it was food. And I also mentioned that his party, the Democrats have been trying to take God out of our society for years so his God Bless America thing was just a ploy that he couldn't believe. I never received another message from him.

People we have got to stop believing this media, lock, stock and barrel like a lot of us do. They lie. Get over it...and move on with your lives. It's as much a fact of life as you breathing to stay alive is. They Lie!

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops

-Robert-

Democrats losing momentum after premature celebration...
Mood:  chatty
Now Playing: And they don't even see it......
Topic: They are being dumb again

I really got a kick out of what the Democrats did this last month...celebrating for a win that they didn't have yet. I loved it.

Now John Kerry is running around saying that President Bush is doing all the wrong things......as if he knew right from wong!



But the President, in his speech the day before yesterday, said some pretty crucial things that has the "Drive By media" going nuts over the audacity of the President to go against their way of thinking. Here is some of his speech. I say that he was pretty smart in what he said:

Terrence Hunt, from the AP says, "Mr. President, the war in Iraq has lasted almost as long as World War II for the U.S. And as you mentioned, October was the dealiest month for American forces this year. Do you think we are winning?" At least he got one thing right on that quote....that World War II has lasted almost as long for the United States....but it also does not mention that World War II was about a 27 year war before all was said and done.....

THE PRESIDENT: The only way we lose in Iraq is if we leave before the job is done. And I'm confident we can succeed in the broader war on terror, this ideological conflict. I'm confident because I believe the power of liberty will defeat the ideology of hate every time. He continues on here explaining why reality does not fit the Drive By Media's template on how things should be......

I know it's incumbent upon our government and others who enjoy the blessings of liberty to help those moderates succeed, because otherwise we're looking at the potential of this kind of world, a world in which radical forms of Islam compete for power, a world in which moderate governments get toppled by people willing to murder the innocent, a world in which oil reserves are controlled by radicals in order to extract blackmail from the West, a world in which Iran has a nuclear weapon. And if that were to occur, people would look back at this day and age and say, what happened to those people in 2006? How come they couldn't see the threat to a future generation of people? Defeat will only come if the United States becomes isolationists and refuses to, one, protect ourselves, and two, help those who desire to live in a modern, peaceful world. Absolutely we're winning. Then he got to talking about Rumsfeld, when Peter Baker, of the Washington Post asked, "When you first ran for President, you talked about the importance of accountability. We learned from Woodward's recent book that secretary Card on two occasions suggested that you replace Secretary Rumsfeld, and both times you said no. Given that the war in Iraq is not going as well as you want, and given that you're not satisfied as you just told us today," and then Bush says, "Wait, Peter, you're asking why I believe Secretary Rumsfeld is doing a good job. I think if I might decipher that through the Washington codes, is that what your asking?

PRESIDENT: I've asked him to do some difficult tasks. One, wage war in two different theaters of this war on terror. And at the same time, asked him to transform our military posture around the world and our military readiness here at home. The transformation effort unto itself is a big project for any secretary to handle. To compound the job he has, he's gotta do that and at the same time wage war. And I'm sadisfied of how he's done all his jobs. He is a smart, tough, capable administrator. As importantly, he understands that the best way to fight this war, whether it be in Iraq or anywhere else around the world, is to make sure our troops are ready, that morale is high, that we transform the nature of our military to meet the threats, and that we give our commanders on the ground the flexibility necessary to make the tactical changes to achieve victory. Then taking responsibility for everything in Iraq, he said he doesn't blame the generals.....

PRESIDENT: This is a tough war in Iraq. I mean it's a hard fight, no question about it. All you gotta do is turn on your TV. But I believe that the military strategy we have is going to work. That's what I believe. The ultimate accountability here rests with me. That's the ultimate. You're asking about accountability. That's what the 2004 campaign was about. If people are unhappy about it, look right to the president. I believe our generals are doing the job that I asked them to do. They're competent,smart, capable men and women. And this country owes 'em a lot of gratitude and support.

I believe I'll be working with a Republican-controlled Congress and a Republican-controlled Senate. Can't you just hear the moaning and groaning from the left as he said this? I understand here in Washington people have already determined the outcome of the election, like it's over, even before the people actually start voting. But that's not what I see. You know, we've got some people dancing in the end zone here in Washington DC. And they haven't even scored a touchdown yet!...nor may they ever!

The president really took it too the democrats on this speech, and I could really hear them moaning and groaning at what was said. But here is something even farther to consider. The polls..........

If the polls are to be believed, the Republicans who control the White House and Congress are in trouble.

Their problem?

People vote their pocketbooks, or wallets, the old adage goes.

But the economy is booming. Even gasoline prices have plummeted. Unemployment, the bogeyman of politicians, has shrunken to a record low point.

As for the security matter, since 9/11, the worst attack on American soil since the Civil War, the United States has been free of any significant terrorist attack. None. Zippo. Zilch.

If Americans do vote the GOP out of either House of Congress, many of these accomplishments are threatened.

Should Democrats get control of the House of Representatives, they have already promised that one of the Republican initiatives that made all these things possible will be rolled back.

Higher taxes -- and with it, economic recession and more unemployment.

The Democrats will also signal the terrorists a "victory" for their side with a push for a quick withdrawal from Iraq. Remember, the Congress, not the president, funds our troops abroad. A Democratic Congress will most assuredly withhold funding unless Bush relents.

The list of Republican accomplishments is both long and real, and provides the platform upon which even greater results will be built under a Republican Congress and White House.

For sure, the GOP has had its share of shortcomings. The economy could be doing better. The deficit could be smaller. The postwar plans in Iraq could have been better implemented.

If anything, the Republicans are facing a message deficit. The liberal media establishment is just not letting them tell their story to the American people.

Here are 10 good reasons why you should vote Republican come election day. You won't hear about them on ABCCBSNBC News.

Reason #1. The economy is kicking butt. It is robust, vibrant, strong and growing. In the 36 months since the Bush tax cuts ended the recession that began under President Clinton, the economy has experienced astonishing growth. Over the first half of this year, our economy grew at a strong 4.1 percent annual rate, faster than any other major industrialized nation. This strong economic activity has generated historic revenue growth that has shrunk the deficit. A continued commitment to spending restraint has also contributed to deficit reduction.

Reason #2. Unemployment is almost nil for a major economy, and is verging on full employment. Recently, jobless claims fell to the lowest level in 10 weeks. Employment increased in 48 states over the past 12 months ending in August. Our economy has now added jobs for 37 straight months.

Reason #3. The Dow is hitting record highs. In the past few days, the Dow climbed above 12,000 for the first time in the history of the stock market, thus increasing the value of countless pension and 401(k) that funds many Americans rely on for their retirement years.

Reason #4. Wages have risen dramatically. According to the Washington Post, demand for labor helped drive workers' average hourly wages, not including those of most managers, up to $16.84 last month -- a 4 percent increase from September 2005, the fastest wage growth in more than five years. Nominal wage growth has been 4.1 percent so far this year. This is better or comparable to its 1990s peaks. Over the first half of 2006, employee compensation per hour grew at a 6.3 percent annual rate adjusted for inflation. Real after-tax income has risen a whopping 15 percent since January 2001. Real after-tax income per person has risen by 9 percent since January 2001.

Reason #5. Gas prices have plunged. According to the Associated Press, the price of gasoline has fallen to its lowest level in more than 10 months. The federal Energy Information Administration said Monday that U.S. motorists paid $2.21 a gallon on average for regular grade last week, a decrease of 1.8 cents from the previous week. Pump prices are now 40 cents lower than a year ago and have plummeted by more than 80 cents a gallon since the start of August. The previous 2006 low for gasoline was set in the first week of January, when pump prices averaged $2.238. In the week ending Dec. 5, 2005, prices averaged $2.19. Today, gasoline can be found for less than $2 a gallon in many parts of the country.

POWs' Lawsuit Could Force Kerry to Come Clean
New Tips & Tricks for Your Funds at Vanguard - Free!
Profit From Warren Buffett's Big Bet 7 Most Dangerous Lies.

Reason #6. Since 9/11, no terrorist attacks have occurred on U.S. soil. Since 9/11 the U.S. has not been attacked by terrorists thanks to such programs as the administration's monitoring of communications between al-Qaida operatives overseas and their agents in the U.S. and the monitoring of the international movement of terrorist funds -- both measure bitterly opposed by Democrats.

Reason #7. Productivity is surging and has grown by a strong 2.5 percent over the past four quarters, well ahead of the average productivity growth in the last 30 years. Strong productivity growth helps lead to the growth of the Gross Domestic Product, higher real wages, and stronger corporate profits.

Reason #8. The Prescription Drug Program is working. Despite dire predictions that most seniors would refrain from signing up to the new Medicare prescription benefits program, fully 75 percent of all those on Medicare have enrolled, and the overwhelming majority say they are happy with the program.

Reason #9. Bush has kept his promise of naming conservative judges. He has named two conservative justices to the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John G. Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. In addition, he has named conservative justices who are devoted to the Constitution as it is written and not as activist liberal judges think it means. The strong likelihood that one or more justices will retire from the Supreme Court makes it mandatory for the Republicans to hold the Senate and have a chance to name new conservative justices.

Reason #10. The deficit has been cut in half three years ahead of the president's 2009 goal, with the 2006 fiscal year budget deficit down to $248 billion. The tax cuts have stimulated the economy and are working.

Now we have to keep them out of office. The best thing to do this next month, is to get out and vote. Do NOT stay at home. This election is critical and we as Conservatives need to let our voices be heard this time. The country depends on it. Our booming economy depends on it...our country's safety depends on it....

Enough said.

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops

-Robert-

It is amazing the mental block of Liberals
Mood:  a-ok
Now Playing: All you have to do is research a bit, and you will see they are wrong.
Topic: They are not so pure.....

I have several things that have to be said today, and this is imperative to the nation as a whole. We have to stay the course on most everything that has been started. You may not agree with the War on Terror, but the thing to remember is, it was NOT started by us. It was brought to us by an attack on our homeland.

One of the reasons that the Liberal Press says that we cannot see images of the attack on 9/11/2001 is because it is too soon and too painful to watch.....well, the real reason that they don't want you to see it all the time is because it will remind you of just what needs to be done, and that goes completely against what they want! They want an America that is beaten, and cowering before the Terrorist, and they don't care that it will hurt this nation to acheive what they want.

Case in point. Nancy Palosi The only thing that this woman cares about is becoming the first woman speaker of the house. She doesn't care about the well being of the United States....and she has proved it in her voting record over the Bush years. (Check my posts about it two and three posts ago here. I detail them.) She has an agenda, just like all Democrats, and that is to get back into office, no matter how they have to lie and cheat to do it....and no matter what harm it does to this country. Just get back into office.

Rush Limbaugh said it best when he said: "Ladies and gentlemen, isn't it the case that what the Democrats are trying to do is suppress GOP turnout in this race? And if they're trying to suppress GOP turnout, could it mean that they're worried about their own?"

That is exactly what they are doing now by putting out poll after poll to show that the democrats are winning and the Republicans are losing. Here is how they do their polls if you don't already know....

They go to a liberal college, or anyplace where they know that most everyone is liberal, and they ask some Republicans.....some Libertarians, some athiests and a lot of Democrats what they think about the job that Bush is doing....and of course, since most of the people asked are Liberal to the core...the results are exactly what they want. And you hear the results of these polls ad nauseum day in and day out...but when a poll actually goes the way of the Republicans, it is either ignored, or if it is a poll that has been talked about .... it will be announced...one time and then forgotten....as they work on the next poll to say just what they want. Polls are rigged, plain and simple. Check this out!

So you want raised Taxes? Vote Democrat.
You want Terrorists fighting here in America? Vote Democrat.
You want unemployment up? Vote Democrat.
You want the world to think we are weak and will roll over if pushed? Vote Democrat.
Do you want to continue blaming our Troops for everything that is bad? Vote Democrat
Do you agree that our troops are guilty before they go to trial? Then you will vote Democrat!

but:

Do you want the economy to stay good, and keep growing? Vote Republican.
Do you want America to be perceived as a strong nation? Vote Republican.
Do you want your tax cuts to continue? Vote Repubican.
Do you want the war on terror to continue where it isn't here? Vote Republican.
Do you want to be safe? DON'T VOTE DEMOCRAT!

It is plain as the nose on your face. The Republicans have done good during their tenure in the majority. Can the Democrats say the same thing about their years of being the Majority? NO THEY CAN'T. But they can boast of bad economy's, higher taxes, high unemployment, taking God out of the Public Places, legalizing Abortion *which is the same as legalized murder*, and telling everyone that God is NOT the higher power...they are. They have gotten away with taking consequences out of doing bad things, which is why we have so many hoodlums and school shootings now. (Remember Columbine? Remember the Amish school shootings a short time ago?) I can't stand it....

The people of the United States just have to be smarter than that......

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops

-Robert-

CNN just crossed the line from decency to obscene......
Mood:  incredulous
Now Playing: Why doesn't anyone petition the news after shit like this?

I was shocked that an American News team, *would be shocked with any team for that matter* which was CNN, did this last week. The Reporter: CNN correspondent, Michael Ware crossed the line and became in my humble opinion a traitor to the United States with his report on Iraq this week, and the traitorist actions were carried on by CNN. It was titled, Latest sniper operations in Baghdad. Do these people not have any conscience at all when it comes to reporting the news? Here is my problem with what they did here.......



When it comes to 9/11, we can't see any video of the World Trade Center towers being brought down, because in the eyes of the news media, "It is too soon, and it is too painful to watch" which is a bunch of bullshit. It needs to be watched to keep us cognisant of why we are fighting this war! The reason why they won't show that is because it is America that is being attacked totally unprovoked, and it is Americans dying. On our homeland.....but this latest video, which raises more questions than it answers, is disgusting to say the least. Here is a portion of the report by Ware and you tell me what is wrong!

WARE: A sniper is watching these American soldiers. You're looking at the unobstructed view from the sniper team's vehicle. And they are waiting for their moment, as the soldiers mingle with Iraqi civilians. People are around them, the sniper spotter, he seems to be operating the video camera, wants me to find another place? No, no, no, comes the reply. Give me a moment, and then - the soldier falls forward. You hear the sniper's vehicle stop and then slip away. CNN obtained the graphic tape through intermediaries from the Islamic Army of Iraq, one of the most active insurgent organizations in the country. It is titled, "Latest sniper operations in Baghdad."

Now isn't that just wonderful! It seems that CNN is in league with the snipers, and has a contact somehow. And the problem is, the enemy knows this too. They know that the news agency don't care for America. They know the news agency doesn't care for the lives of Americans that are being snuffed out merilessly. And the proof of this is: why don't they impart this kind of information to our brave young men and women of our armed forces to maybe save some lives of Americans here....??? Oh no....they have to be the ones who show this to the American public, and the enemy knows this which is why they sent it to CNN, and CNN did this just for ratings which is shown in a quote from Anderson Cooper after the report:

COOPER: Just a production note. We dipped to black at points in that report so as not to show the moment of the bullet's impact, now isn't that special! and I should just restate that sniper video and the interview with the insurgent that you just saw are exclusive to CNN.

You know what I take from this crap? CNN is in bed with the enemy! There is no other way to take this. If they weren't, they wouldn't be so up on what the ratings for this would or could do for CNN! I remember the day when I was younger when the media...even though it was Liberal to the core, would take a video like this or a report like this and give it to the military so that some lives could be saved. But oh no...not now. Ratings are more important than saving American lives in a war that they don't believe in. This is just sick, and I hope that their ratings plummet because of this crap. These people have no scruples at all. They believe that America is the bad guy here, and if we are attacked unprovoked then we are the ones that are wrong.....if we retaliate, then we are the ones that are wrong....if we are winning...we are the ones that are wrong. The only way we are right is if we are getting our butts kicked and it is always righteous when that happens. Where is their love for this country that they and the Liberals always profess to have? I will tell you. It is in the crapper. In other words...It doesn't exist! These people are just as much an enemy to us as the terrorists are. And this has to be dealt with...and soon!



CNN said that they decided that they were in business here to show the "unvarnished truth" of what was going on...but they wouldn't know the truth, unvarnished or not, if it came up and bit them in the butt!

All they know is that American soldiers here were being killed, without any chance for them to save their lives. And CNN didn't care to let them know either. All they cared about was the ratings of showing an "exclusive" video that only they had. All I can say to this is......YOU ARE JUST AS MUCH AN ENEMY TO THE UNITED STATES AS THE TERRORISTs ARE! WHY DON'T YOU JUST GET OUT AND JOIN OUR ENEMY, CAUSE WE DON'T WANT YOU HERE ANYMORE.

We have brave young men and women fighting for our freedoms out there, and they deserve to know the truth about what is going on and deserve to know the subject of this video, and what is going on, because their lives depend on it. I know that CNN, ABC, CBS, and all the other LIBERAL news medias out there don't care about that...but they had better start caring....because these are somebodies babies.....their young boys and girls...and the parents hopefully will not stand for this kind of reporting and disregard for American servicemen's lives! I am totally surprised that they haven't been deluged with hatemail condemning them for it! I know if I had a boy or girl over there and I saw this...I would be furious!

God Bless America
God Bless our Troops
God, keep them safe......

-Robert-

Over the years of viewing this.....the double standard is glaring
Mood:  celebratory
Now Playing: John Kerry, Ted Kennedy....your day is coming.....
Topic: They are not so pure.....

I have watched over the years, the Republicans get shellacked each time that one of them does something wrong, and the media will cover it ad nauseum for weeks and months at a time. But have you ever seen such glee in them from things that a Democrat did wrong? (At note here is Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, etc.) Now don't jump up and say that I say that because I am a Conservative. Just sit down and listen....for once, you liberals, and open your closed brains to these FACTS.

In 1983, there were two in the Senate house that were brought up on charges much like Foley, (except) in that one, sex was actually something that happened between the representatives and prostitutes, not just instant messages!).....Representative Stubbs was one, the other I don't remember. The other, a Repubican was censured, and in the election that year, lost his seat.....and I don't think that I ever heard from him again when it came to public office. The Democrats went after him with a zealous glee that was reminecent of parahna heading for meat! And the Democrats Won....he lost his seat! The democrat? He got a standing ovation from the democrats...and went on to serve many more years in honor, retiring in 1996! Again, the Democrats won!

Richard Nixon, and watergate. I know for a fact that he didn't do anything that most democrats and republicans over the years had done........he just got caught...and he got impeached. Again, the Democrats won!

Now it isn't so cut and dried here. When it comes to a Republican doing something bad, the Liberals have a lot of tools at their disposal, and the biggest one is the PRESS. The Liberal Press in this country will tell lie after lie and never get held accountable for it....just like the Liberals in our government, John Kerry, John Murtha, Dick Durbin, Teddy Kennedy, Nancy Palosi.....see a trend here? We can go on here, one by one, and show you the things that these people have done to the United States, things that are out there to find...but the press will NEVER report on them cause it wouldn't serve their agenda....*and like I said in a post here a few days ago....yes they have an agenda....*

Teddy Kenndy, that high and mighty fat blob of a senator from Massachussetts, back in 1969 went out drinking at a party, and in his words 'don't remember what happened'....but documentation (that has been suppressed enough) so he was never convicted of his several crimes of that day, in July of '69. From a site that is available to all: http://www.ytedk.com/intro.htm the cowardice of Ted Kennedy is laid out in hour to hour chronicalling showing the timeline of his complete involvement in Mary Jo Kopeckne's death, and the things that he did wrong that day that should have landed him in jail. One thing was, that he was driving on a suspended drivers license, that had been suspended back in February. Many months before. That was hushed up and the copy that the DMV had of that "mysteriously"disappeared! There was no investigation, though one was started!.

Chappaquiddick has been called: "the most brilliant cover-up ever achieved in a nation where investigative procedures are well developed and where the principles of equal justice prevail, at least during some of those moments where people are watching."
~ The Last Kennedy by Robert Sherrill.

And just a few years later, in 1973, Ted Kennedy had the balls to stand up and say: " Do we operate under a system of equal justice under law?
Or is there one system for the average citizen and another for the high and mighty? "
~ Senator Ted Kennedy, 1973 He should know the answer to that question...he is one of the high and mighty, and there is another system for him! Trouble is, a woman lost her life that day in July of '69 because of his actions......or should I say inaction to save her. After driving his car off that bridge into the water, he got out, swam ashore...and went home to sleep while Mary Jo Kopekne struggled for her life and died in his car! Accounts on that site that I list above show that she may have lived for a hour or so after the accident struggling to stay in the air pocket in the car till it was depleted! Any one of us would have been sent to prison for the rest of our lives for that alone, but that was not his only infraction of the law that night...and he is still high and mighty in the Senate, which is a total disgrace!

John Kerry. This idiot, though not going as far as killing an innocent young woman in his car, did much worse in that he lied about our troops in Vietnam, and his involvement in it. Now finally, a law suit has been filed:

POWs LAWSUIT COULD FORCE KERRY TO COME
CLEAN ON VIETNAM ?WAR CRIMES? CHARGES
When John Kerry slandered an entire generation of men who fought in Vietnam he branded them as "war criminals." Today, much of the same thing is being said about our young men and women in Iraq.Now, a lawsuit filed in Philadelphia?s Court of Common Pleas will test the very foundation of Kerry?s anti-war persona for the first time. It isn?t dubious medals or Kerry?s disputed service record in Vietnam that is being called into question. This time Kerry may finally be forced to answer for the events that launched his public career, one that made him an anti-war hero for many American liberals and a turncoat for millions of Vietnam veterans.The lawsuit (Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation, et al. v. Kenneth Campbell, et al.) challenges the basis, the factual accuracy of then Lt. (j.g.) Kerry?s acrimonious testimony before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 1971. It was there Kerry?s public career was catapulted with his now ubiquitous portrayal of American soldiers as murderers, rapists and torturers "who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam . . . [and] razed villages in a fashion reminiscent of Genghis Khan." For the anti-war, anti-American protesters, the American soldiers are the "terrorists," and the enemies are the victims of a barbaric U.S. military which tortures and murders defenseless civilians.That false premise, one of the most vicious and enduring smears spawned by Kerry 35 years ago, will also be put to the test once Kerry?s true "Band of Brothers" are put under oath in a Philadelphia courtroom.The background to this lawsuit is long and complex, but even a condensed version is rich in irony and poetic justice.It had it roots in 2004 with the documentary Stolen Honor: Wounds that Never Heal. Many may recall the film, although it is probably best known for not being seen, suppressed after Sinclair Broadcasting Company courageously announced it was going to air the documentary in its entirety. Thanks to Kerry and his liberal colleagues in the Senate and their enablers in the mainstream media, Sinclair was browbeaten into withdrawing the film, its broadcast license threatened by a Kerry campaign manager in 2004. The film?s producer, Carlton Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize and Peabody Award-winning investigative reporter, interviewed former POWs for the documentary.I was among those whom Sherwood, a decorated Marine combat veteran himself, asked to participate in Stolen Honor. I was a POW for nearly six years, held in North Vietnam prison camps, including the notorious Hanoi Hilton, a place of unimaginable horrors ? torture, beatings, starvation and mind-numbing isolation. When Kerry branded us "war criminals," he handed our captors all the justification they needed to carry out their threats to execute us. Thanks to Kerry, Jane Fonda and their comrades in the anti-war movement, our captivity was prolonged by years. The communists in Hanoi and Moscow couldn?t have had a better press agent to spread their anti-American propaganda. To guarantee Stolen Honor would never be seen by anyone ? not even theatre-goers ? the producer was slapped with a libel and defamation lawsuit.

That lawsuit was filed by a long-time anti-war disciple of the Massachusetts Senator. He was one of Kerry's key war crimes "witnesses," one of several on whom Kerry claims he based his Senate testimony. The lawsuit put a unique spin on the definition of defamation, claiming that Stolen Honor had damaged the public reputations of himself, Kerry and others by simply quoting their own words and criticisms of America during the Vietnam war!The POWs and the wives of POWs who participated in Stolen Honor refused to abandon the facts conveyed in the film. For some of us, it was the first time since our release by the Communists in 1973 that we were able to have our voices publicly heard, to tell our stories about the consequences of Kerry?s treachery. In 2005, we formed a nonprofit organization, the Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF), to gather records, documents and other materials to form a fact-based, educational repository for students and scholars of Vietnam history and to tell the true story of the American soldiers in Vietnam. The VVLF?s mission is "to set the record straight, factually, about Vietnam and those who fought there." For our efforts, we were promptly sued by two long-time anti-war Kerry followers and VVAW members. It was clear that Kerry not only wanted to punish us for Stolen Honor; he intended to use surrogates to sue us into permanent silence and financial ruin. Forced to spend huge sums to defend ourselves from these frivolous lawsuits, we have filed a countersuit against these Kerry surrogates and intend to reveal the truth about the lawsuits and their sponsors. We believe that we can prove that the purpose of nearly two years of litigation was to protect John Kerry, to drain us financially and spiritually, and to prevent us from setting the record straight.At stake is ultimately nothing less than the integrity of the American military in Vietnam, the honor of the men who served their country, the nobility of those who gave their lives, and the truth of America?s history in Vietnam. Until or unless we do correct the existing record, the American military may never be free of the myths and smears of Vietnam, its honor and integrity cleansed as it fights to defend freedom at home and around the world.Our mission is hardly over. We hope you will join us in fighting this battle . . . for our soldiers, then and now. For more information about Vietnam, the foregoing litigation, or to make a donation, please access the VVLF website now ? Go Here Now.Col. George E. "Bud" Day
Director and President,
Vietnam Veterans Legacy FoundationCol. George E. "Bud" Day, USAF (Ret.,) was a POW in North Vietnam for five years, seven months and 13 days. He served in three wars (WWII, Korea, and Vietnam) and earned the Medal of Honor. He is the Air Force?s most decorated living veteran. He is the Director and President of the Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation, Inc., an organization created to better educate and inform the public about the Vietnam War, its events, its history, and the men and women who sacrificed to serve their country. There is more on this...but you get the picture. Finally someone is trying to do something about that horsed face scum John Kerry and his lies.

John Murtha As a democrat he ought to be totally ashamed of himself by taking the side of the Terrorists and against the American Soldier who is out there sacrificing everything just to give HIM the right to say stupid things like: 'the American soldier is going in the dead of night and killing women and children, torturing.....' You ought to be ashamed MR. JOHN MURTHA, and you ought to know better than that. You are a vet yourself!!!! This statement includes John Kerry!

Nancy Palosi aspires to be the first woman speaker of the house this coming November, and if the majority of the people in the United States would stop and check out her voting record in the Senate, you would see that SHE IS NOT the woman for the job! She voted against the Patriot Act....everytime! She voted against securing our borders.....everytime!She voted against the Bush Tax cuts....everytime! She voted against the War on Terror.....everytime! Her Bush hatred, the same as all Liberal Demorats, knows no bounds, and they will do anything (whether good for the country or NOT) to hurt him while in office. She voted against the bill to not legalize the illegal Immigrants.....everytime! She voted against funding for the war on terror after 9/11.....everytime! Do you people see that she does not have the best interest for the United States at heart? She, like John Kerry, is prolonging the war on terror, by allowing it to continue without the help from our government that it needs, and because of that, more and more of our brave young soldiers are being killed, because people like her and John Kerry have shackled our troops into a way of fighting that cannot be won.....Which brings us to their latest comments....that the "war cannot be won!" Of course not.....you made it so. Let us fight the war on Terror the way it needs to be fought, and we WILL WIN IT....NO DOUBT ABOUT IT! We are actually still winning it regardless of your rhetoric, it is just taking us longer and is bloodier than it would have been if you would have kept your traps shut....and done the RIGHT thing!

The liberals in our government are only good for coverups, prolongation,(of everything that is bad and wrong) and procrastination (of everything that could help this country.) And they need to be stopped!

We have got to look at all that they stand for and get them the hell out of office. Starting next month. To hell with their trumped up polls that say they will win. . . . get out and vote on Novemer 6th and show them again, that they will not win with their anti-American rhetoric

God Bless America
God Bless Our Troops

-Robert-

You may not be happy with the Repubicans........
Mood:  a-ok
Now Playing: But voting the Democrats in, is NOT the Answer.....
Topic: Time to Reform.....

I know that for a lot of you, the Republicans haven't done a good job while in office. But there are a lot of things that most of you don't know.....and you need too.

Yesterday I heard on the television an advertisement for the Democrats saying that the nations deficit is killing this nation, and that only the democrats can help it to go away. Bullshit on that one!

The deficit as told by President Bush in February said that it woulod be down so much and before he said it would be down...it is down even more than that! Of course the democrats know about this...but that is not what their agenda is....Yes the Democrats have an agenda. It isn't for the betterment of the United States....oh no nothing like that...their agenda is to lie and cheat and do anything they can to get back into the majority. That is it. They do not care if they hurt the nation doing it....they just want it done!

Maryland. There is a particular strain of liberal vitriol that is saved up for one specifc type of individual. And that individual is any black American who runs for political office as a Republican. If there is such a thing as treason to a liberal, this is what it is. Maryland's Republican Lt. Governor Michael Steele is getting a taste of that right now. He is black.....he is a Repubican.

Maryland Democrat Congressman, and House Minority Whip is Steny Hoyer. Hoyer is campaigning for Cardin who is the Democrat running against Mr. Michael Steele, all bets are off in this campaign because Mr. Steele is black. Hoyer tells a campaign audience .. who is a largely black, campaign audience .. that Michael Steele "slavishly" supports the Republican Party. Of course afterwards, Mr. Hoyer says that he shouldn't have said that, cause he was caught. Caught like a bug in a rug...but he figures, just like all Democrats, if they are caught doing something wrong, all they have to do is get mad, or apologise. All will be okay. But all is NOT okay. The Democrats are living a double standard, and it needs to stop. If the situation was flipped....and Steele was a black Democrat, and the Republican had said the same thing that Hoyer did about a democrat...all HELL WOULD BREAK LOOSE and the media would follow suit and not drop the subject till everyone knew about what was going on...and letting everyone know that what was going on was wrong. But it won't happen because Steele is a Repubican. The double standard stands only for the Democrats.

The other lie the Democrats tell, and they do this every election, they say that the tax cuts have to be repealled...and that they will not raise taxes. Well people, if the tax cuts are repealed....what do the taxes do? They go up! Don't be dumb on this. They want to raise taxes..and they know that raising taxes is not a popular thing with the public...so they call it something else...but it is still the same thing....Raising your taxes.

Nancy Palosi right now is in "hiding" because she doesn't want her voting record in the house to hurt her chances to become the speaker of the house...but here is some of her voting record over the years......read and weap especially if you vote for the democrats and make her the speaker......

There is so much more that I can say...but it is totally depressing to think of her becoming Speaker of the house....and the things she will do. Her past voting, like voting against the Immigration bill to help stem the Illegals....voting against the Patriot act.....every time....voting against the tax cuts....every time.....voting against everythign that will help the united states....every time...she is one scary _itch.

God Bless America

-Robert-

Posted by Robert Garding at 12:22 PM EDT

Share This Post

Post Comment | Permalink