Friday, September 8, 2006
Hey Liberals......why the DOUBLE standard here???
Mood:
irritated
Now Playing: What the F$#@* Are you people doing?
Topic: They are being dumb again
Is it that you don't remember
September 11, 2001? Now I know your memories are
very very short....but hey,....you have to be able to remember those planes flying into the
World Trade Center that day....and then the
Pentagon......
Oh yes, now I remember. People like your Michael Moore keeps telling you lies about that. Saying idiotic things that seem to resonate with you Liberals. Things like, The World Trade Centers were NOT attacked...President Bush brought them down.
The Pentagon being hit that day.....
oh yes, You liberals say it was Bush again!Are you people completely off your rockers? Now I know that Americans are short minded, and like I mentioned the other day here, it is because of 30 second sound bites, 60 second commercials, 60 minute Television shows, and 2 hour movies...in which everything works itself out.
People, life does not work that way. No matter how hard you try to make it.....it just doesn't! And if you believe that it does, you need to go see a pshychiotrist, cause your looney as they come.
You need to go back to school. But not the schools of today, cause you have effectively ruined them.
I remember when Michael Moore came out with his so called "truthful documentary" that was so chock full of lies that it shouldn't have ever been published. The Republicans didn't say much, and Michael Moore continued to thrive in the spotlight, even after detail after detail of his book was disproved....nothing was said bad about it.
Now comes the
ABC show called
The Path to 9/11 and in it are stories of the truth about Clinton and his involvement and how his inactivity while he was president led to the attacks of 9/11 and how he was directly responsible for the NON capture of Osama Bin Ladin.....
Wellllll, you guessed it.... the democrats are up in arms. If it wasn't scathing and truthful, the democrats would probably look at it as something that they do and keep quiet...but since it tells the truth about the Clinton Administration and not in glowing terms, they are up in arms.
Harry Reid says that the film is disgraceful and if they
(ABC) airs it, that they could lose their license to broadcast....Clinton denies everything (
of course he does, he has his legacy to keep safe)
Of course,
ABC buckles under the Democrats onslaught. It doesn't matter that the story tells the truth about Clinton's involvement, the truth don't matter....Cause the Democrats don't care about the truth. Then don't even know what it is!
Somewhere along the line, the Democrats have lost their way. Somewhere between the 1940's, and the 2000's, the democrats have forgotten what it is like to tell the truth about anything. And so has the media.
Since the 1970's, the Democratic party has been actively pursueing the idea that the best thing that they can do is to rewrite history. Not the way it really happened, but to a way that helps them out. Who cares if the story they come up with is false, and a complete lie, they don't care. They already own the press, and it lies to the whims of the Democratic party. And now,
ABC is following suit, and changing details in the story of the
Road to 9/11, taking Clinton's involvement with what happened, taken out.
As Rush Limbaugh said today, the Democrats are squealing like stuck pigs.....they know that they are wrong. Always have been, and they definitely are now.
With the 2006 elections coming up, the Republicans
have to deal with the Democrats. I really have my doubts if the Republicans lose the house or the Senate, and I doubt if they will lose the white house, cause the Democrats have no one with any caliber to take it.
But we have to be careful.....they democrats are on the hunt, and if we are not careful, they will bombard us from behind and we will be left in the dust. They will Lie and cheat to get what they want....and we have to counter that with the truth.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 2:43 PM EDT
Thursday, September 7, 2006
Bush: Secret CIA prisons a 'vital' tool
Mood:
caffeinated
Now Playing: What are they thinking, or not thinking?
Topic: They are being dumb again
The story below I will keep in Italics, and my comments will be in regular type. As usual I will use Bold and Underlining to accentuate my thoughts and the important parts of this story. All I can say on this one is, when will they ever learn that the secret stuff was secret for a reason?
By DEB RIECHMANN, Associated Press Writer 
WASHINGTON - President Bush on Wednesday acknowledged for the first time that the CIA runs secret prisons overseas and said tough interrogation forced terrorist leaders to reveal plots to attack the United States and its allies.
Don’t you idiots realize, that without the secret places talked about here, and without the ”tough interrogation” used in these places, so many more people would have died over the years? One KEY fact has to be brought out here people. Terrorists and the enemy, who have been rigorously trained in WAR, and use tough interrogation(actually torture) methods themselves, have probably been also trained to not give up informationInformation that could save an American soldiers life or the lives a hundreds of Civilians, if given up. If nothing else works to get this information to save lives, then Hard Interrogation MUST BE USED! In order to save lives.
Bush said 14 suspects — including the mastermind of the Sept. 11 attacks and architects of the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole and the U.S. Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania — had been turned over to the Defense Department and moved to the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, for trial.
I say, who the hell cares what we do, as long as we prevent another attack on the United States? What we don’t know, wont hurt us, but it sure as hell can kill us if it isn’t used! People, we have to have this kind of work, no matter how unsavory it may be to your palets, it has to be done, for national security. If the normal person knew the things that were done during World War II, and in Vietnam, you would be amazed. We are at war. War is NOT pretty, and can be very cruel. MOST OF THE TIME IT IS. Get on with your lives. Now I mostly am not talking to the American public, and I so wish that this was being read by Harry Reid, Dicky Durbin, John Kerry, and others who cannot comprehend the fact that we are at war, and much much worse can and WILL BE DONE to us, if we don’t do it first and find out their secrets!
"This program has been, and remains, one of the most vital tools in our war against the terrorists," Bush said. "Were it not for this program, our intelligence community believes that al-Qaida and its allies would have succeeded in launching another attack against the American homeland." Now people....reread these last two paragraphs until their message sinks in. Do you want us to be attacked again?? Cause if you do, then keep doing the crap that your doing now, and it WILL HAPPEN AGAIN!
Releasing information declassified just hours earlier, Bush said the capture of one terrorist just months after the Sept. 11 attacks had led to the capture of another and then another, and had revealed planning for attacks using airplanes, car bombs and anthrax. Nearing the fifth anniversary of Sept. 11, Bush pressed Congress to quickly pass administration-drafted legislation authorizing the use of military commissions for trials of terror suspects. Legislation is needed because the Supreme Court in June said the administration's plan for trying detainees in military tribunals violated U.S. and international law.
This is ridiculous! We are at War! How freaking many times does this have to be said for it to sink in. War causes things to be done that are NOT done in normal times. Bad things....yes and terrible things. The problem with following laws that protect people during peacetime, is that during war it only protects the bad guys.....never the good! The only thing it does for the good is to UNDERMINE their ability to win the war.
The president's speech, his third in a recent series about the war on terror, gave him an opportunity to shore up his administration's credentials on national security two months before congressional elections at a time when Americans are growing weary of the war in Iraq.
And I don’t believe the American public is growing weary of the war in Iraq. The press is constantly spinning the story there, so nothing good comes out......that is what the American public is growing weary about. Never hearing what actually happens there!
Democrats, hoping to make the elections a referendum on Bush's policies in Iraq and the war on terror, urged anew that Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld be made to step down. They argued that the White House has mishandled the war, mismanaged the detainee system and failed to prosecute terrorists.
This my friends is the ONLY thing coming out of the press that I have heard that has even an ounce of truth in it. ‘The Democrats are hoping to make the elections a referendum on Bush’s policys.’ There is nothing more to that. The have been spinning the truth for years, and now they think they can take advantage of the false truth they have been spinning cause they believe the lies they tell. That is the KEY here, in understanding the Liberal Mind.
"For five years, Democrats have stood ready to work with the president and the Republican Congress to establish sound procedures to bring terrorists to justice," said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "Unfortunately, President Bush ignored the advice of our uniformed military and set up a flawed system that failed to prosecute a single terrorist and was ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court."
And in that line (LIE) told by Harry Reid, you will see it. How could they do what he said they have for five years, and have everything they say, blast what the president has done, always saying he is wrong? How can doing that all the time mean, that “they have stood ready” to work with the President? That is a double double lie lie!! And Harry Reid Knows IT!
With the transfer of the 14 men to Guantanamo, there currently are no detainees being held by the CIA, Bush said. A senior administration official said the CIA had detained fewer than 100 suspected terrorists in the history of the program.
Still, Bush said that "having a CIA program for questioning terrorists will continue to be crucial to getting lifesaving information." Earlier this year, an anti-torture panel at the United Nations recommended the closure of Guantanamo and criticized alleged U.S. use of secret prisons and suspected delivery of prisoners to foreign countries for questioning. Some Democrats and human rights groups argued that the CIA's secret prison system did not allow monitoring for abuses and they hoped that it would be shut down.
First off here people, there shouldn’t be monitoring of what they do there. The stuff they do is harsh to say the least....but wouldn’t you rather something like that be done to someone, to get information from them, to save lives, than to have that someone released, only to capture your son or daughter, and do the same and maybe WORSE to them? Think about that next time you come up in arms with the stupid democrats over this subject. Would you rather it be them or your son or daughter.....or us, when they finally invade this country cause the democrats have made it so easy for them to do?
"He finally acknowledged the elephant in the room that everybody had always been talking about," said Jumana Musa, advocacy director for Amnesty International USA. Oh my God, this organization is the worst of them all. If it was up to them.....the terrorists would torture and kill us all and it would be their right to do so, but let us raise a finger to protect ourselves like in Israel’s case....HEAVEN FORBID! Oh God please come help us and strike these people down with some common sense!
"I think what surprised me is he seemed to be asking Congress to legalize it through statutes, essentially allowing him to continue to detain people in secret by sort of putting forth all this information that they got from these folks and somehow using that to justify what has been recognized by U.N. committees as an unlawful act and contrary to our treaty obligations."
What Harry Reid and others don’t realize, is that this stuff has been constitutional since the beginning of the country, for the defense of this country. They are the ones who ARE NOT following the constitution. The Constitution is a Living document, true...but the founding fathers who wrote it didn’t mean for the Liberals to come in and make it a document that will weaken the United States, and that is exactly what they have been doing for the last 50 years or so!
The president declined to disclose the location or details of the detainees' confinement or the interrogation techniques. "I cannot describe the specific methods used — I think you understand why," Bush said in the East Room, where families of some of those who died in the Sept. 11 attacks heartily applauded him when he promised to finally bring the perpetrators to justice. "If I did, it would help the terrorists learn how to resist questioning and to keep information from us that we need to prevent new attacks on our country. But I can say the procedures were tough, and they were safe and lawful and necessary." Bush insisted that the detainees were not tortured.
By the way people.....Ask the Terrorists the same question about the prisoners they hold, and I will wager you they cannot say the same thing.....and that my friends is the difference between us and them.
"I want to be absolutely clear with our people, and the world: The United States does not torture," Bush said. "It's against our laws, and it's against our values. I have not authorized it, and I will not authorize it." Bush said the information from terrorists in CIA custody has played a role in the capture or questioning of nearly every senior al-Qaida member or associate detained by the U.S. and its allies since the program began.
He said they include Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused Sept. 11 mastermind, as well as Ramzi Binalshibh, an alleged would-be 9/11 hijacker, and Abu Zubaydah, who was believed to be a link between Osama bin Laden and many al-Qaida cells. He said interrogators have succeeded in getting information that has helped make photo identifications, pinpoint terrorist hiding places, provide ways to make sense of documents, identify voice recordings and understand the meaning of terrorist communications, al-Qaida's travel routes and hiding places, The administration had refused until now to acknowledge the existence of CIA prisons.
Bush said he was going public because the United States has largely completed questioning the suspects, and also because the CIA program had been jeopardized by the Supreme Court ruling. The Supreme Court ruled that prisoner protections spelled out by the Geneva Conventions should extend to members of al-Qaida. In addition to torture and cruel treatment, the treaties ban "outrages against personal dignity" and "humiliating and degrading treatment."
Administration officials said they were concerned the ruling left U.S. personnel vulnerable to be prosecuted under the War Crimes Act because the language under the Geneva Conventions was so vague. The Supreme Court ruling put a damper on the CIA's program, virtually putting the interrogation of detainees on hold until such prohibitions like "outrages against personal dignity" could be defined by law. "We're not interrogating now because CIA officials feel like the rules are so vague that they cannot interrogate without being tried as war criminals, and that's irresponsible," Bush said in an interview with "CBS Evening News."
The administration-drafted legislation would authorize the defense secretary to convene a military commission with five members, plus a judge to preside. It would guarantee a detainee's access to military counsel but eliminate other rights common in military and civilian courts. The bill would allow reliable hearsay and potentially coerced testimony to be used as evidence in court, as well as the submission of classified evidence "outside the presence of the accused." Senate Republican leaders hailed Bush's proposal.
"It's important to remember these defendants are not common criminals," said Senate Majority Whip Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. "Rather, many are terrorists, sworn enemies of the United States."
But Democrats and GOP moderates warned that the plan would set a dangerous precedent, ensuring the legislation would not likely sail through Congress unchanged. Republican Sens. John Warner, John McCain and Lindsey Graham have drafted a rival proposal. Unlike the administration's plan, the senators' proposal would allow a defendant to access to all evidence used against them.
The plan by Warner, chairman of the Armed Services Committee, also would prohibit coerced testimony. Graham, R-S.C., said withholding evidence from a war criminal sets a dangerous precedent other nations could follow. "Would I be comfortable with (an American service member) going to jail with evidence they never saw? No," Graham said. Also on Wednesday, the Pentagon put out a new Army field manual that spells out appropriate conduct on issues including prisoner interrogation.
The manual applies to all the armed services but not the CIA. It bans torture and degrading treatment of prisoners, for the first time specifically mentioning forced nakedness, hooding and other procedures that have become infamous during the war on terror.
___ Associated Press writer Anne Plummer Flaherty contributed to this report
Now if this whole post here doesn’t give you people some common sense to realize that we are at war and things that are NOT SAVORY is going to happen...and the worse things that happen, will be on the other side. You know that one Harry Reid, Dick Durbin? Our enemy? Cause they DO CONDONE torture...and they use it all the time. Good God men.......use your brains! It is possible to do you know.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 9:03 AM EDT
Updated: Thursday, September 7, 2006 2:05 PM EDT
Wednesday, September 6, 2006
Harry Reid has put his foot in it.....
Mood:
d'oh
Now Playing: Just look at this one....
Senator Harry Reid of Nevada keeps putting his foot in it. The democrats seem to not be able to get it through their thick skulls so that the facts can sink into their brains. No wonder they act so brain dead!
On the news this morning, I heard him say that we were not safer now than we were 5 years ago, because there have been over 400 Terrorist actions all over the world since.
Now I have to ask you this, mister Harry Reid. Are you more interested in being safer here? or are you more interested in EVERYONE else being safer? You people just can't seem to realize, that since the attacks on the world trade centers and the pentagon on September 11, 2001, there have been
NO TERRORIST ATTACKS on the United States! Why is that so damned hard for you people to comprehend? Why is it so hard for you people to comprehend the fact that
we are at WAR!Now I am not just picking on Harry Reid. Senator Dick Durbin opened his stupid mouth the other day too. The democrats keep talking like they are going to take everything back this year in the election. Well let me tell you something. That part about "taking back the House and Senate and Possibly the White House" are the only things that the Democrats have said since Bush took the White house that says anything about them NOT BEING THE MAJORITY PARTY!
Since the White house, the House and the Senate has been in Republican control, the democrats have acted like they have had the majority the whole time. If things don't go their way...they throw tantrums like "filibusters". Now don't get me wrong. A filibuster is a politcal working horse to get things through that need to be.....but it is not a tool for throwing a tantrum like a baby, and that is what the democrats do.
The funny thing that I have noticed lately, is that suddenly John Kerry, the idiot of the east, has been strangely silent lately.
The main thing that I, and many others in the US can (and yes you democrats, we CAN see) that the Republicans DO have a plan and they have been doing their best to implement it.....but the Democrats
ONLY plan, is to
CUT AND RUN and
criticise the Bush Administration.I keep hearing the democrats saying that they have a plan for the war on terror...but I never hear anything about it....all we hear is Appeasement, criticism, hoodwinking, and politicizing. There is no other plan for the Democrats. They do not have any plan, except a plan to STOP BUSH, and that don't matter to them if they hurt our country doing it, just so long as they succeed.
It is like I said on my post yesterday, "You want gas in your car? You want heating oil next winter? You want the dollar to be worth anything? You better hope the
Jihad, the
Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the
Islamic reformation wins.......We have to help the
Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the
Inquisition, ie., the
Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al-Qaeda and the
Islamic movements. We have to do it somewhere.......the bottom line is we have to deal with Islamic terrorism
until we defeat it, wherever it is.
It will not go away if we ignore it (like the Democrats want us to do.)......It is difficult to understand why the American left does not grasp this. They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom, but evidently not for Iraqis.
President Bush in his speech yesterday said all the right things for the defense of the United States.....and what did the democrats say? You guessed it.....of course to them he is wrong...so I guess that means the defense of America is wrong......NOT! Any defense of this country to keep the American citizens and America safe is
NOT WRONG YOU IDIOTIC DEMOCRATS!The democrats
have to figure out what side they want to be on.
OURS or the
ENEMY'S. They are helping the enemy with
everything they do and say.....I say, go be with them....they will kill you and torture you just as quickly as they do anyone else. Maybe that is what needs to be done to get their priorities in the right place...and that is to
defend AMERICA! Lets work hard this election to get as many of them
out of office as we can. It
is really in our hands....and if we want a great America...
we have to do it. No ifs, ands, or buts about it.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 9:48 AM EDT
Tuesday, September 5, 2006
A "Real" History Lesson for all You Liberally Minded....
Mood:
bright
Now Playing: Not one cooked up by the Liberals need to lie about it.....
Topic: Liberals Insanity
Do you really know your history?If not, you HAVE to read this...... Below is a
real History lesson for all of you who have forgotten or (
chose to ignore) the warning signs and hints of what has come before.....If you read it, you will realize why I and others have stressed this so hard over the last few months. It is a scary thing, but needs to be brought to mass knowledge!
For some of the younger folks this is a History lesson. For most of us it was real life!!!!
We have seen this one before,
but reiteration never hurts, and forward it far and wide. (And if not forward it, sent people to this site to read it.) You can also read it from a post from Steve Burns, on the Reagan_Bush Conservatives site at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reagan_bushconservatives/
You have to be a member to read this post which I have added here...but if you are Conservative and want the United States to be able to continue to be the great nation it was in the past, come and join us. All Conservatives are welcome.
'Sixty-three years ago, Nazi Germany had overrun almost all of Europe and hammered England to the verge of bankruptcy and defeat, and had sunk more than four hundred British ships in their convoys between England and America for food and war materials.
At that time the U.S. was in an isolationist, pacifist mood, and most Americans wanted nothing to do with the European or the Asian war.
Then along came Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, and in outrage Congress unanimously declared war on Japan, and the following day on Germany, which had not yet attacked us. It was a dicey thing. We had few allies.
France was not an ally, as the Vichy government of France quickly aligned itself with its German occupiers. Germany was certainly not an ally, as Hitler was intent on setting up a Thousand Year Reich
in Europe. Japan was not an ally, as it was well on its way to owning and controlling all of Asia. Together, Japan and Germany had long-range plans of invading Canada and Mexico, as launching pads to get into the United States over our northern and southern
borders, after they finished gaining control of Asia and Europe.
America's only allies then were England, Ireland, Scotland, Canada, Australia, and Russia. That was about it.
All of Europe, from Norway to Italy, except Russia in the east, was already under the Nazi heel.
America was certainly not prepared for war. America had drastically downgraded most of its military forces after WWI and throughout the
depression, so that at the outbreak of WW2, army units were training with broomsticks because they didn't have guns, and cars with "tank" painted on the doors because they didn't have real tanks. And a huge chunk of our navy had just been sunk or damaged at Pearl Harbor.
Britain had already gone bankrupt, saved only by the donation of $600 million in gold bullion in the Bank of England, that was actually the property of Belgium, given by Belgium to England to carry on the war when Belgium was overrun by Hitler (a little known
fact).
Actually, Belgium surrendered in one day, because it was unable to oppose the German invasion, and the Germans bombed Brussels into rubble the next day just to prove they could. Britain had already been holding out for two years in the face of staggering shipping loses and the near-decimation of its air force in the Battle of Britain, and was saved from being overrun by Germany only because Hitler made the mistake of thinking the Brits were a relatively minor threat that could be dealt with later, and first turning his attention to Russia, at a time when England was on the verge of collapse, in the
late summer of 1940.
Ironically, Russia saved America's butt by putting up a desperate fight for two years, until the U.S. got geared up to begin hammering away at Germany.
Russia lost something like 24 million people in the sieges of Stalingrad and Moscow alone... 90% of them from cold and starvation, mostly civilians, but also more than a MILLION soldiers.
Had Russia surrendered, Hitler would have been able to focus his entire war effort against the Brits, then America. And the Nazis could possibly have won the war.
All of this is to illustrate that turning points in history are often dicey things. And now, we find ourselves at another one of those key moments in history.
There is a very dangerous minority in Islam that either has, or wants and may soon have, the ability to deliver small nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons, almost anywhere in the world.
The Jihadis, the militant Muslims, are basically Nazis in Kaffiyahs -- they believe that Islam, a radically conservative form of Wahhabi Islam, should own and control the Middle East first, then Europe, then the world. And that all who do not bow to their will of thinking should be killed, enslaved, or subjugated. They want to finish the Holocaust, destroy Israel, and purge the world of Jews.
This is their mantra.
There is also a civil war raging in the Middle East -- for the most part not a hot war, but a war of ideas. Islam is having its Inquisition and its Reformation, but it is not known yet which will win
-- the Inquisitors, or the Reformationists.
If the Inquisition wins, then the Wahhabis, the Jihadis, will control the Middle East, the OPEC oil, and the US, European, and Asian economies. The techno-industrial economies will be at the
mercy of OPEC -- not an OPEC dominated by the educated, rational Saudis of today, but an OPEC dominated by the Jihadis.
You want gas in your car? You want heating oil next winter? You want the dollar to be worth anything? You better hope the Jihad, the Muslim Inquisition, loses, and the Islamic Reformation wins.
If the Reformation movement wins, that is, the moderate Muslims who believe that Islam can respect and tolerate other religions, and live in peace with the rest of the world, and move out of the 10th century into the 21st, then the troubles in the Middle East will eventually fade away, and a moderate and prosperous Middle East will emerge.
We have to help the Reformation win, and to do that we have to fight the Inquisition, i.e., the Wahhabi movement, the Jihad, Al Qaeda and the Islamic terrorist movements. We have to do it
somewhere. And we can't do it everywhere at once. We have created a focal point for the battle at a time and place of our choosing........in Iraq.
Not in New York, not in London, or Paris or Berlin, but in Iraq, where we are doing two important things.
(1) We deposed Saddam Hussein. Whether Saddam Hussein was directly involved in 9/11 or not, it is undisputed that Saddam has been actively supporting the terrorist movement for decades. Saddam is a terrorist.
Saddam is, or was, a weapon of mass destruction, who is responsible for the deaths of probably more than a million Iraqis and two million Iranians.
(2) We created a battle, a confrontation, a flash point, with Islamic terrorism in Iraq. We have focused the battle. We are killing bad people, and the ones we get there we won't have to get here.
We also have a good shot at creating a democratic, peaceful Iraq, which will be a catalyst for democratic change in the rest of the Middle East, and an outpost for a
stabilizing American military presence in the Middle East for as long as it is needed.
World War II, the war with the German and Japanese Nazis, really began with a "whimper" in 1928. It did not begin with Pearl Harbor. It began with the Japanese invasion of China. It was a war for
fourteen years before America joined it. It officially ended in 1945 -- a 17 year war -- and was followed by another decade of U.S. occupation in Germany and Japan to get those countries reconstructed and running on their own
again .. a 27 year war.
World War II cost the United States an amount equal to approximately a full year's GDP -- adjusted for inflation, equal to about $12 trillion dollars. WWII cost America more than 400,000 killed in action, and nearly 100,000 still missing in action.
The Iraq war has, so far, cost the US about $160 billion, which is roughly what 9/11 cost New York. It has also cost about 2,200 American lives, which is roughly 2/3 of the 3,000 lives that the Jihad snuffed out on 9/11. But the cost of not fighting and winning WWII would have been unimaginably greater -- a world dominated by German and Japanese Nazism. Americans have a short attention span, conditioned by
30 second sound bites, 60 minute TV shows, and 2 hour movies in which everything comes out okay. The real world is not like that. It is messy, uncertain,and sometimes bloody and ugly. Always has been, and probably always will be.
The bottom line is that we will have to deal with Islamic terrorism
until we defeat it, whenever that is.
It will not go away if we ignore it.
If the U.S. can create a reasonably democratic and stable Iraq, then we have an
"England" in the Middle East, a platform, from which we can work to help modernize and moderate the Middle East.
The history of the world is the clash between the forces of relative civility and civilization, and the barbarians clamoring at the gates. The Iraq war is merely another battle in this ancient and never-ending war. And now, for the first time ever, the barbarians are about to get nuclear weapons.
Unless somebody prevents them. We have four options: 1. We can defeat the Jihad now, before it gets nuclear weapons.
2. We can fight the Jihad later, after it gets nuclear weapons (which may be as early as next year, if Iran's progress on nuclear weapons is what Iran claims it is).
3. We can surrender to the Jihad and accept its dominance in the Middle East, now, in Europe in the next few years or decades, and ultimately in America.
4. Or, we can stand down now, and pick up the fight later when the Jihad is more widespread and better
armed, perhaps after the Jihad has dominated France and Germany and maybe most of the rest of Europe. It will, of course, be more dangerous, more expensive, and much bloodier.
If you oppose this war, I hope you like the idea that your children, or grandchildren, may live in an
Islamic America under the
Mullahs and the
Sharia, an America that resembles Iran today.
The history of the world is the history of civilizational clashes, cultural clashes. All wars are about ideas, ideas about what society and civilization should be like, and the most determined
always win. Those who are willing to be the
most ruthless always win. The
pacifists always lose, because the
anti-pacifists kill them.
Remember, perspective is everything, and America's schools teach
too little (true) history for perspective to be clear, especially in the young American mind.
The
Cold war lasted from about
1947 at least until the Berlin Wall came down in
1989. Forty-two years. Europe spent the first half of the 19th century fighting
Napoleon, and from
1870 to 1945fighting Germany.
World War II began in 1928, lasted 17 years, plus a ten year occupation, and the U.S.
still has troops in Germany and Japan. World War II resulted in the death of more than 50 million people, maybe more than 100 million people, depending on which estimates you accept.
The U.S. has taken more than
2,000 KIA in Iraq. The
U.S. took more than 4,000 killed in action on the morning of
June 6, 1944, the first day of the Normandy Invasion to rid Europe of Nazi Imperialism.
In WWII the US averaged 2,000 KIA a week -- for four years. Most of the individual battles of WWII lost more Americans than the entire Iraq war has done so far.
But the stakes are at least as high ... A world dominated by representative governments with civil rights, human rights, and personal freedoms ... or a world dominated by a radical Islamic Wahhabi movement, by the Jihad, under
the Mullahs and the Sharia (Islamic law).
It's difficult to understand why the American left does not grasp this. They favor human rights, civil rights, liberty and freedom,
but evidently not for Iraqis. "Peace Activists" always seem to demonstrate here in America,
where it's safe. Why don't we see Peace Activists demonstrating in Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan, North Korea, in the places that really need peace activism the most?
The
liberal mentality is supposed to favor human rights, civil rights, democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc., but if the Jihad wins, wherever the Jihad wins, it is the end of civil rights, human rights,
democracy, multiculturalism, diversity, etc. Americans who oppose the liberation of Iraq are coming down on the side of their own worst enemy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Raymond S. Kraft is a writer living in Northern
California. Please consider passing along copies of this
article to students in high school, college and
university as it contains information about the
American past that is very meaningful today -- history about America that very likely is completely
unknown by them (and their instructors, too). By
being denied the facts of our history, they are at a
decided disadvantage when it comes to reasoning
and thinking through the issues of today. They are
prime targets for misinformation campaigns beamed
at enlisting them in causes and beliefs that are special
interest agenda driven.
Thomas E. Zinn Commander, USN - Retired
Box 160 Stockett Rd.
Morgantown, WV 26508
304.594.1669/1476
KEEP THE FAITH, HOLD ON TO THE HOPE, AND WITH PRIDE.....
Veterans Information
http://veteransinfo.org
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PrayerWarriorsoftheUSA/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ChristianVeteransandWives/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Veterans_Wives-Families/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AO-Awareness-and-Info/
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you, Jesus Christ and the American G.I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom.
Support the country you live in..... or live in the country you support.
In order to see the Rainbow, you must first endure some rain.'
With all this being said, we have to fight this War with the determination that
America displayed when we fought and WON the Second World War.
Send this on to everyone you know, or send them to this address or the Reagan_Bush Conservatives
group that was listed at the beginning of this post.
This is so important to the future of this Great Nation.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 8:24 AM EDT
Updated: Tuesday, September 5, 2006 8:36 AM EDT
Monday, September 4, 2006
Democrats call White House rhetoric on Iraq 'outrageous'
Mood:
incredulous
Now Playing: Are they so Brain Dead they HAVE TO do this crap?
Democrats call White House rhetoric on Iraq 'outrageous'
WASHINGTON (AFP) - Opposition Democrats expressed outrage at a campaign by President George W. Bush's administration portraying critics of the Iraq war as defeatists reminiscent of those who tried to appease Nazis before World War II.
Bush's top aides, including Vice President Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, delivered strident speeches last week describing the conflict in Iraq as a crucial part of the "war on terror," invoking World War II and the Cold War.
"Can we truly afford to believe somehow, some way, vicious extremists can be appeased?" Rumsfeld asked in his address.
Democratic lawmakers said the White House was trying to attack its critics by questioning their patriotism and determination to fight terrorist threats.
"I thought his statements were outrageous," Representative Marty Meehan (news, bio, voting record) of Massachusetts told CNN's "Late Edition."
"They attack anyone who's willing to stand up and oppose their policy. I think that's wrong."
He accused the Bush administration of trying to link the September 11, 2001 attacks with the unpopular war in Iraq ahead of mid-term legislative elections in November.
"I think the administration is basically trying to take the fifth anniversary of 9/11 and take terrorism and put them all together and mix it up with Iraq," he said.
Democratic Senator Joe Biden of Delaware said Rumsfeld had gone "too far."
"He knew exactly what he was doing, the only similarity I find between this war and World War II is that this war is shortly going to have lasted as long as World War II," Biden told ABC's "This Week."
Okay, I have to say this about Biden's stupid comment here. It has to be said so you understand..., back then, during World War II, the Democrats didn't do everything they could to undermine the war, like they have this time. Wars have a tendancy to run smoother, and end quicker if their is no opposition, be it on the home front or the war front. We have had opposition on the war front, but most of the opposition has come from the home front idiots like Biden who don't know what they are talking about, but try to make everything think they do. I just wish that they would shut the hell up so we could get the job done sooner. The more they bellyache about babyish things here, the longer this is going to take! Plain and simple people!He said the administration's language was too simple and that the various threats and crises facing the United States could not be solved by military power alone.
"We need political solutions, and so it's sad that no one in this administration is speaking to what these solutions are," Biden said.
The solution is simple people.....stop making the United States out to be the bad guy in eveything that is done without YOUR consent. If you democrats and Liberals would step back and look...you will see you have not had one good thing to say about what President Bush has done during his whole presidency, and he HAS done many good things. After all, we haven’t had a repeat of 9/11 have we? Under Clinton, we would probably have already been under the rule of Osama Bin Ladin!But Republican lawmaker Christopher Shays defended Rumsfeld's words.
"I read Rumsfeld's speech and I buy into it entirely," Shays told CNN. "I think people need to wake up to this war that we are confronting, Islamist terrorism is a real threat. We see it in London. We see it in Europe. We're going to see it in the United States and we better wake up.
Now I don’t look at this whole thing the way the Liberals do. They are all Doom and Gloom when it comes to what the president is doing...there is never anything good said about him. It is just complete and absolute Bush Bashing that has no reason for being except for the fact that the Liberals hate Bush. That is the only reason for their stupidity and rhetoric that we have heard over the last six years.
The Democrats need to grow up and learn to take defeat the way they always expect everyone else to do when it happens to them. This is NOT a one way street designed just for the Democrats to get their way all the time. That is just total bullshit, and I for one will not take it anymore without raising my voice in opposition to the babyish tendancies that the Democratic leadership has displayed daily over the last six years!
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 9:22 AM EDT
Updated: Monday, September 4, 2006 9:31 AM EDT
Sunday, September 3, 2006
What a Stupid Argument!
Mood:
caffeinated
Now Playing: When are we as Conservatives going to act like we are a Majority?
Topic: Liberals Insanity
by Robert Garding
posted 09/03/06
Liberals, I think, are among the dumbest people in the world. They see a cause, and off they ride to whatever’s or whoever’s rescue. No matter how much the cause will cost the American public in money, loss of freedoms and/or loss of Morality and Religion.
Since the 1950’s, America has degenerated so far down the line when it comes to Moral Issues, that Morality to a Liberal is a bug that has to be stamped out of existance. And for the last 50 or 60 years, the democrats have been doing just that!.
And we can go subject by subject to prove this has been happening. Take first off, Religion. Through the last 50 years, the Liberals have been taking religion out of our society. Not all at once mind you, cause the people would not have allowed that, but in little bits and pieces, so that we really didn’t notice, till it is almost gone, then we start thinking: “hey now wait a minute, this can’t be happening!” But it is. The ACLU the Liberals mainstay in this issue, has been going after church organizations for as long as it has been an organization. The Ten Commandments that you used to see in front of Courthouses, you almost never see anymore, cause the ACLU and their cronies the Liberals have passed laws to make that kind of display illegal. The Cross on Mt. Soledad in California.....one measly athiest complained that the cross was offensive to them, and "poof" all of a sudden it is in court, and there was a battle to keep the cross or tear it down. It even got so far as a judge ordering the City to tear it down or face fines. Oh my God what are we doing? That Cross was put there as a Memorial to the Men and Women who fought and died in the Korean conflict, then later for All our wars.
The next thing that happened....hell there have been so many that I can’t even remember the litany of events that lead to this fiasco that we are in now, but that is the point. It happened over so many years, that the public don’t even comprehend what happened....cause it happened so slow. Like when you boil a lobster. You can set the lobster in cold water, and slowly heat it up, and the Lobster will adapt till it dies. You drop it in hot water, and it suffers terribly and dies fast. That is the point that I am trying to get across. We are the Lobsters that have been placed in cool water, and then the Liberals slowly heated it up.....if we don’t stop this trend that was started so many years ago, we are going to cease to exist as a country. That is inevitable.
This crap about political correctness is only a ploy that the Liberals have used to keep this momentum going when the public started to perceive what was going on. As it was bound to happen sooner or later. The real meaning of Political Correctness when it comes to a Liberal, is to do what the Liberals want, to hell with anything else.
Charlie Daniels in a post yesterday said several things that bring this whole thing to light. And all he did was ask Questions. Let me give you some of them.......
Does anybody think that we should have opened new oil fields and developed alternative fuel sources decades ago so we could we could thumb our collective noses at the Middle East? I will answer this since Liberals will not see the logic or the “light of truth” in these questions. I really think that we shouldn’t have let the Liberals smoke us on this issue. We would probably have much cheaper petroleum products now if we had, and we would, as Charlie Daniels put it, be able to thumb our noses at the Middle east.....and they would be no where as rich now as they are, cause all of our Billions and Billions we have given to them for fuel, would have stayed here!
Does anybody think that we should have stayed the course in Iraq the first time and completely destroyed Saddam’s ability to wage war? Okay....off on a tangent.....Yes, we should have stayed the course, cause if we had, we wouldn’t be in the fix that we are in with the Middle East, and Israel would have never been brought into it. The Hezbollah/Israel war wouldn’t have happened, cause the problem would have been taken care of and we wouldn’t be sitting now with our thumbs up our butts trying to figure out a “politically correct” way to solve this. People, the only way to solve this is to obliterate their ablitity to make demands and war! Plain and simple. PERIOD!
Does anybody think that Bill Clinton should have taken Osama Bin Laden into custody on the three occasions he had the opportunity? Okay.....we are in a War now, and it is mostly because of Bill Clinton and his administration. They were handed Osama Bin Ladin three times.....and it has been said....on a silver platter....but he refused to take him into custody because he didn’t want to ruffle feathers! Hell the man was a womanizing coward, with no common sense! HE IS THE REASON WE HAVE THE PROBLEM WITH OSAMA BIN LADIN, AL-QEADA AND TERROR THAT WE DO!
This next one is actually three questions, but could be answered the way I will:
Does anybody doubt that the Iranians are developing a nuclear bomb? Does anybody doubt that they will use it if develop it? Does anybody doubt who they’ll use it on? The answer to this is really simple. We have Osama Bin Ladin, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, both instigators of Terror and anything that has anything to do with the destruction of Israel, the only Democratic state in the region, and the tearing down of America. The Liberals could have taken care of both...but did they? No, they used the UN cause they didn’t want to have America be the Victor here, and then they did what they do best. They Appeased, appeased, appeased appeased! Sanctions hell....we should go in and blow their ablility to do anything hostile off the face of the earth! We should have gone in decades ago, when the Liberals were whining about “oh we can’t...we’ll destroy the Caribo’s ability to mate! We’ll destroy the eco-system! Oh boo hoo.” and we fricken bought it hook line and sinker. Now the Middle east has us by the collective balls and there is nothing we can do, cause it takes about a decade to make a refinery! They are developing Nuclear weapon technology, and if you liberals can’t get your blinders off and see this, then we Conservatives and American Citizens don’t want to hear your bellyaching when they turn this whole thing against us and your wondering what the hell happened!
Does anybody besides me believe that the cease fire in the Israeli, Hezbollah war was a mistake, just a chance for Hezbollah to rearm? I have been saying this for months on this blog. If Israel is stopped before Hezbollah’s ablity to make war is totally destroyed, Hezbollah will sit back, appease the Democrats and the world, saying that they will not start hostilities back up, and they will keep this story going while rebuilding what Israel tore up, and then continue till they are better equipped and better ready to take on Israel again, and then Israel will have to fight for her existance again. Are you Liberals stupid? Yes you are!
Has anybody besides me noticed the deterioration in the morals of American youth since we’ve taken God out of our public schools? I know I have! And it is impossible for you to say you haven’t. Back in the 50’s and early 60’s, you never heard of kids wanting to have sex and needing condoms all the time....you do now. In the 50’s and early 60’s you never heard of kids taking weapons to school to kill other students because of a disagreement. If anything, you had fist fights, that were settled on the spot...but never gun play. Now you do! Liberals beware, cause we are finding out about your stupidity more every day.
Does anybody besides me worry that one day we’ll have a President who is soft on terrorism.I know that I agree with Charlie on this one 100%. I worry daily that the democrats are going to finagle their way back into the White House and suddenly we are going to lose everything that we as Americans hold dear. We get a president who is soft on Terror, and suddenly the Terror cells around the world will have an easy mark in the United states, and since the Liberals have effectively removed our borders, the invasion WILL then start...and we won’t be able to do anything about it but to fight and probably die.
Does anybody still think that Islam is a peaceful religion? Okay, granted, not all Muslems are bad. Most likely a majority of them are good, but the radial Islams are horribly misguided children who think that just because they are pushing this war against the ‘infidels’ of the world in God’s name, that they are right. God doesn’t condone killing....but He isn’t the kind of God who will say “don’t kill if your life is being threatened. Through out the bible, there are instances where God led His people to safety through holy wars and famine and pestulance. Now Islam is trying the same ploy...but it won’t work .... because God doens’t do that to Innocent people.
Give me a break people and stop being so manipulated. The Liberal left has been manipulating you for decades, and it’s time that this whole charade stops. We need to let the Liberals running for office know that we don’t want their stupidity and American ruining Rhetoric. We need to let them know that they do not have the best interests of America at heart. The only interests they are concerned about is their own. Don’t be fooled by their talk. They are only interested in getting back into power. They had it for 40 years, and they want it back badly.....so they can continue to ruin America.
God Bless America
God Bless Israel
God Bless Us All!
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 10:31 AM EDT
Saturday, September 2, 2006
Common Sense has flown the coup...
Mood:
d'oh
Now Playing: A look at History....
I have troubles believing what is going on. We have a President who has the backbone to go after the Terrorist and the Liberals want to appease. Just like pre world war II...and yes, damnit, I am back to this. I can't believe how people can be so dense.
In 1936 though 1939, the world looked at what Hitler was doing with disdain, but didn't do anything because they didn't think that he was a threat...and he was saying all the right things. Just like someone else we know today....(and no, I am not talking about Bush. This one in the brackets is there for you
Bush haters that can't seem to get your brain in gear when it comes to him.)
Now I admit, that President Bush has done some dumb things...but all in all, he has had this countries well being at the head of his agenda.
At least he has an agenda All we hear from the Democrats is how bad he is doing. So, if you think he is doing so badly, why don't you give us some of your great advice about what to do....? But no...you can't because you don't have any. All you want is to
hoodwink the American public into thinking you do, so you can get back into office.
Well, I think that you may do it in the house this coming election....The Republicans
may lose the house this November...but I doubt if they lose the Senate. But all in all, I can't understand, when the
Conservatives say something,
why is it always wrong in your eyes? It can't be, if you guys just look back into the past and see what is really going on.
John Kerry always says one thing, and then when the polls swing the other way, or public opinion swings...
he does too. He has
NO TRUE IDEAS on what he stands for, because he doesn't stand for anything. Just what is popular at the moment. And that includes the war on Terror. He is just like all the other Liberals out there...they have
forgotten the one true fact. This war was
NOT started by
George W. Bush....it was started when the World Trade Centers were attacked and brought down.
How freaking hard is that to understand people? We didn't start this thing. I know that you all believe that whatever happens to us we brought it on ourselves, like the photo above suggests....but it isn't true.
If it was, why are there be so many people trying to get here? I mean, we must be one crappy country if everyone wants to be here.........
Give me a break!America used to be the shining beacon for the world, and our opinion was considered something to be sought after. But the 40 years of Liberal control over this government and the laws, before 1994, has made it so we have a price to pay. And going back to a
Liberally led government isn't going to make it better...If anything, it is going to make things worse. So for you sickophants, who insist that
G.W. Bush is the problem...then just wait until you guys succeed in getting back into power...What will you say then, when we are invaded by Terrorists and we have to lose our freedoms that we all enjoy as Americans? I know what you will say.
It's because Bush didn't take it to the Terrorists when he was President! I can hear it now....
and nothing......
no nothing will be said about the mirad of things that you the
Liberals did to make sure that he couldn't.
I am sick of this mentality,
or the complete lack of it that you Liberals display on a daily basis. And then, when things go against you...you blame
blame blame.... Take responsiblility for once....before you totally destroy this country!!
God Bless America
God Bless Israel
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 10:43 AM EDT
Friday, September 1, 2006
This has to be read carefully..........
Mood:
don't ask
Now Playing: Setting the conditions for disaster
Topic: Liberals Insanity
This is a must read, for all who do not believe that Israel and the United States are in danger from the Extreme Islamists of the Middle East.....
By Caroline B. Glick
No country in the world lets outsiders dictate its policies on fundamental issues of national security. Israel must not be the first to do so
http://www.JewishWorldReview.com | Tuesday, Shin Bet Director Yuval Diskin warned of the growing threats to Israel's security emanating from the Gaza Strip and Northern Samaria in the aftermath of the latest war. If the proper steps are not taken to stop the massive transfers of advanced armaments to Gaza, he warned, in just a few years, it will turn into a second south Lebanon.
In Lebanon itself, Hizbullah is creating an illusion of cooperation with the Lebanese army in the south in order to put us all to sleep as it quietly rebuilds its forces in anticipation of Iran's order for it to renew the war against Israel. No doubt Hizbullah chieftain Hassan Nasrallah's assertions last week that Hizbullah has no intention of opening a second round and that it had no idea that Israel would respond so massively to its abduction of Ehud Goldwasser and Eldad Regev on July 12, were aimed at confusing Israel and calming the Lebanese. At least as far as Israel is concerned, his goal was accomplished. Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and the Israeli media pounced on Nasrallah's statements as "proof" that Israel had won the war.
In the meantime the Ayatollah Republic is proceeding steadily towards the acquisition of nuclear capabilities. The conciliatory international reactions to Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad's announcement Thursday that Iran rejects the UN Security Council's demand that it end all uranium enrichment activities actually preceded Ahmadinejad's insolent statement. On Wednesday, EU Foreign Policy Chief Javier Solana was busily attempting to renew talks with Iran.
For its part, the UN is behaving not as an international policeman, but as Iran's defense attorney. During his visit to Israel Wednesday, UN Secretary General Kofi Annan sounded like an Arab leader with his unrestrained, obnoxious condemnations of Israel for every act of self-defense it has taken in Gaza and Lebanon on the one hand, and with his seemingly endless tolerance for Iranian threats of nuclear genocide against Israel on the other.
During his press conference with Olmert, Annan intimated that from his perspective, the problem with Iran's threats to annihilate Israel is not that they are illegal or morally inexcusable. Rather Iran's threats are wrong simply because Israel is a member of the UN. Surrealistically ignoring both Iran's efforts to acquire nuclear weapons and its command over the latest war in Lebanon and Gaza, Annan stated bizarrely, "One cannot wipe away Israel with statements."
Today, unbeknownst to the Israeli public, the Olmert-Livni-Peretz government is steering Israel down a course which if not quickly abandoned, will render our right to self defense — and by extension our independence — conditional. The proliferation of security threats is being exacerbated by the government's facilitation of an UN-EU diplomatic bid to chip away at Israel's right to defend itself against Hizbullah, the Palestinians and Iran.
The present danger is rooted in the text of UN Security Council resolution 1701 that set the guidelines for the ceasefire in Lebanon. That decision constituted an unprecedented diplomatic victory for Hizbullah by placing the sub-national, jihadist, illegal militia on equal footing with Israel.
Moreover, resolution 1701 set the terms for the reinforcement of UNIFIL forces (more on this later) in a way that enables Hizbullah to continue to reinforce its units and retain its presence in south Lebanon while barring Israel from exercising its right to defend itself against the growing threat.
Aside from the language regarding
UNIFIL's role, 1701 proscribes Israel's freedom of action in three additional ways. First, the resolution named
Ahmadinejad's solicitor,
Kofi Annan as arbiter of the sides' compliance.
Annan revealed how he will be using this authority two weeks ago when he
condemned the IDF's commando raid in Baal Bek while beginning his calls for Israel to lift its air and sea blockade of Lebanon and so enable Hizbullah to rearm not only by land, but by air and sea as well.
Second, although Olmert and Livni loudly champion the European forces being deployed to Lebanon as an important Israeli diplomatic achievement, the fact is that the decision to empower the EU to dominate UNIFIL is disastrous for Israel. While protesting their "love" for Israel, the Europeans are making no bones about the fact that their decision to lead UNIFIL is motivated by their intention to prevent Israel from defending itself.
Italy's Communist Foreign Minister Massimo D'Alema made this point clearly in his interview last Friday with Ha'aretz. There he explained that the EU's goal in Lebanon is to "prove to Israel that it can ensure its security better through the politics of peace than through war."
D'Alema then insulted the US adding, "The American policy, which Israel also supported, created an impossible situation. The thinking was that it is possible to control the world via the power of a hegemonic liberal power. This philosophy has created serious damage, and now the US is looking for a logical way out."
So by deploying troops to UNIFIL, the Europeans will show us that the only way to contend with enemies who wish to destroy us is by appeasement and more appeasement.
The Europeans and Annan also do not hide the fact that they plan to use their deployment in Lebanon as a springboard for achieving greater influence on Israel in its dealings with the Palestinians. In this vein, D'Alema stated, "I think if things go well in Lebanon, a similar positive process could also begin in the Gaza Strip: The release of [Israeli hostage Cpl. Gilad] Shalit, a Palestinian unity government that meets the criteria set by the international community, and the presence of a UN force to bolster the Palestinian government."
Here the EU is openly joining forces with radical leftist Israeli policymakers led by Meretz leader MK Yossi Beilin who for the past two years have been quietly advancing the idea of internationalizing the conflict. After both Israel's negotiations and its unilateral surrender of land to the Palestinians both led to war, the thinking is that the Palestinians will accept Israel after the UN divests the Jewish state of its ability to defend itself.
If the above is insufficient to convince us that the UNIFIL forces whose arrival is so eagerly awaited by Olmert-Livni-Peretz is not a good thing for Israel, there's also the Islamic element of the proposed force. Both Annan and the Europeans are insisting that a force of up to 7,000 soldiers from Muslim countries be included in the UNIFIL force. These soldiers are set to be sent from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Malaysia and Turkey. All of these countries are commonly referred to as "moderate Muslim countries." This assertion bears investigation.
A coalition member of Bangladesh's government is the jihadist party Jamaat-e-Islami. Its student activists recently sent death threats to two prominent intellectuals for teaching the country's youth the values of secularism, democracy and science.
Furthermore, in November 2003, Bengali journalist Salah Uddin Shoaib Choudhury was arrested as he waited to board a flight to Bangkok with continuing service to Tel Aviv. Choudhary, who was set to attend a conference in Israel about how the media can promote peace, was accused of sedition and spying for Israel. During his 17 month incarceration, he was repeatedly tortured. Bangladesh plans to send 2,000 soldiers to Lebanon.
Then there is Indonesia, the largest Muslim state. As punishment for inciting the terror bombings in Bali in 2002 that killed 202 people, the not particularly independent Indonesian judiciary sentenced Jemaah Islamiyah leader Abu Bakar Bashir to 30 months in prison, the last five of which were commuted in June.
In May, Ahmadinejad was received by roaring crowds during his visit to Jakarta. In an interview with the Wall Street Journal Tuesday, Indonesian Defense Minister Juwono Sudarsono said that he believes the best way to secure South Lebanon is for Hizbullah forces to be "absorbed" into the Lebanese army.
As the war in Lebanon raged, the Malaysian government called for all nations of the world to cut off their diplomatic relations with Israel. This week, senior Malaysian officials said that there is no justification for the West's opposition to Iran's nuclear program.
Of all the Muslim countries who are planning to contribute forces to UNIFIL, Turkey is the only one that has diplomatic relations with Israel. As a result, to date, its forces are the only ones the Olmert-Livni-Peretz government is willing to see deployed in Lebanon. Two weeks ago, during a visit with Turkish Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul, Olmert said, "Turkey plays an important role in the Middle East and will continue to do so." He added, "Israel has confidence in Turkey."
While until the formation of the AKP's Islamist government in 2002 it made sense for Israeli prime ministers to say such things, today such statements are unjustified. Over the past four years, Turkey has been transformed from a stalwart US and Israeli ally into one of the most overtly anti-American and anti-Semitic states in the world. By the same token, Turkey has gone to great lengths to warm its relations with the Arab world and Iran.
During the war IDF Military Intelligence discovered that Iran was shipping weapons to Hizbullah through Turkey. After the Hamas's electoral victory in January, Turkish Prime Minister Recip Erdogan was the first international leader to host Hamas terror leaders in an official visit. During the war, Erdogan announced Turkey's support for Hizbullah stating that "nobody should expect us to be neutral and impartial."
From all of this it is apparent that the participation of Muslim armies in the UNIFIL force — even if they are only from Turkey — can easily lead to a situation where the IDF will find itself battling against UN forces. Alternatively, as the UN and EU foresee, cowed by the "international community," the Olmert-Livni-Peretz government may simply concede Israel's right to self defense in spite of the growing threats from Hizbullah, the Palestinians and Iran.
As for America, disturbingly the Bush Administration, like the Olmert-Livni-Peretz government, is showing acute signs of policy collapse. In a near inexplicable move, the State Department issued a visa to former Iranian president Muhammad Khatami. Obscenely, the former leader and regime flack for the Islamic supremacist ayatollahs has been invited to speak at the National Cathedral in Washington, DC.
As it did at the beginning of the war in Lebanon, the Olmert-Livni-Peretz government set the proper goals for managing the ceasefire. But as it did during the war, it has proceeded to take every step possible to ensure that those goals will not be achieved.
Presently, the troika hopes that through UNIFIL Israel will cobble together a coalition against Hizbullah, while it is actually facilitating the formation of a coalition that will protect Hizbullah against Israel. They have failed to recognize that to secure its national security interests, Israel does not need to negotiate, it needs to act. The only reason the EU and the UN feel comfortable ordering Israel around is because the Olmert-Livni-Peretz government obeys them.
Things do not have to be this way. No country in the world lets outsiders dictate its policies on fundamental issues of national security. Israel must not be the first to do so.
I say AMEN! The things that the organizations involved with UNIFIL in this are doing is to make sure that when the attack againt Israel starts again...that She will not be able to defend herself. And the problem here is.....We are going along with this.
UNIFIL, as I have said before has interests in Hezbollah, and that is the main reason for keeping the UN out of this whole thing. No matter what they say or anyone else says...this is a precursor to the planned destruction of Israel....then the plan continues on to the other “democracies” around the world, including us.
Of course, everyone is saying that Israel is wrong here cause the world is against her....but can’t you people just look back....forget what the stupid Liberals and the UN is saying and see what the worlds ideas on Hitler and Nazi Germany were, just before World War II broke out. No one was for them to be stopped either!
If we could learn from history, this fact would slap us all in the face so hard that we wouldn’t be able to ignore it. Unfortunately, Liberals can’t learn from history, so therefore, people are going to die because of their stupidity.
It is a sad state of affairs, that mankind is so short minded, that we can’t remember the atrocities that happened in the past. And because we can’t seem to remember.....we are doomed to repeat it. I know I for one do not want anyone to repeat what happened to the Jews under the rule of Hitler......but it is coming.... Not under Hitler, cause he is dead.....but under the same sort of maniac.....like Ahmadinejad, and Osama Bin Ladin. Need I say more? I certainly hope that you all are smart enough to know by now that we are in trouble....and so is Israel. Serious Trouble. And the only way to put a stop to this is to do what Israel started out to do. Annialate the Terrorists ability to make war. We didn't let Israel do that....now they are rebuilding and rearming....for the next coming action.
God Bless America
God Bless Israel
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 10:19 AM EDT
Thursday, August 31, 2006
Liberals are wrong......
Mood:
chatty
Now Playing: and because of it, we are in trouble if they win in November....
It doesn't matter how many times they are told they are wrong, and how many times they are proven that they are wrong...the
Liberals just won't admit that they have been bested. It is complete
stupidity on their part.
To admit they are wrong just isn't in their vocabulary, but it should be....cause they are wrong most of the time.
They want us to leave Iraq now and to heck with the consequences, but the problem there is....if we leave Iraq, then the terrorists will just follow us here. Is it that the Democrats really want the Terrorists here? I am afraid that they do. They don't care for the United States, or the freedoms that we enjoy. They wish that we would be just like the Middle east, and have no freedoms....which is not what the majority of the American citizens want. But of course, the Democrats don't care about what we feel.
But I have another situation to clear up here too. And that is the Republicans. When they first started taking power in 1992, they had the
Contract for America which of course the Democrats opposed...but it was a good thing for America, and it got the Republicans elected.
But since they have gotten elected, and the years have gone by, the Republicans have abandoned all the good things that they stood for. And this November, in the elections...the results will probably show that.
If the Republicans don't lose the majority in the House and the Senate, they will lose some of it...and it is because they have abandoned what their Moral Base stood for. And I unfortunately, think that the only way to get them back to the moral standards that they got elected for, is to get beat in November. I think it would be a bad thing for the country for that to happen...but it would be a good thing cause it would set the Republicans back on their path...which is what the Moral Majority of America stands for.
I hate saying this...but maybe it has to be done. I hate the idea of Nancy Palosi being the speaker of the house...but if it sets the Republicans back on the right path, maybe we need to suffer that.
The Conservatives have good ideas...but for now...I think they have abandoned everything that they stood for to get them elected.
They need to step back...take a look at what got them where they are, and return to that.
It is the only thing that will keep them in office.The Republicans are not like the Democrats. Republicans can't be corrupt and stay in office. The Democrats can....
(namely Teddy Kennedy) but the Repubicans can't. I know, It's a double standard...but we have let it get to this point...we have to live with it.
All I can say is this....
go out and vote in November...
and vote your ticket.....
WE CAN'T LET THE DEMOCRATS WIN. IT WOULD BE DISASTEROUS TO OUR COUNTRY, as
Ollie North says, and not in the way it was in
Vietnam. There we got
boat people...this time we would get
nuclear weapons. Think on that and be dismayed if the democrats win in November.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 4:26 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, August 31, 2006 9:49 PM EDT
Wednesday, August 30, 2006
Another "Proof" of how Liberals Lie.....
Mood:
cheeky
Now Playing: What happened Mr. Baldwin????
I ran across a post on the Charlie Daniels "soapbox" from the year 2001. You all remember that year? Remember what Alex Baldwin said before the election? Here is what Charlie Daniels said, and then you should remember:
Dear Mr. Baldwin,
It is my understanding that you have made the statement that if George W. Bush was elected president that you were going to move out of the United States, and I thought I would make a few suggestions in case you’re having trouble making up your mind where you want to go.
Australia is a nice place, pretty liberal, however I think I should warn you that the first time you start showing your militant attitude, one of them Aussie good ole boys will probably take your head off, literally.
You might try Africa except there are an awful lot of guns over there and I know you couldn’t abide that.
How about Russia? Oh no, you would be miserable in a country which exports so much of the world’s furs.
Let’s see, maybe China would be the answer. It’s about as far left as you can get without falling off the world, but you’d have to give up criticizing the government. They don’t take kindly to that sort of thing in that part of the world. I guess Canada’s an option but it and Mexico are probably too close to the country you refuse to live in.
I would suggest Brazil but with what’s going on in the rain forest you’d probably have apoplexy.
How about this? Why don’t you get together with a bunch of your rich Hollywood friends and buy an island and start your own country. You could take Al Gore along with you and make him President. Barbara Striesand could be Secretary of State and the Congress could be a star studded body of flaming liberals. Oh they could have a grand old time passing hate crime legislation and crafting cradle to grave social issues. Just think, no conservatives flies in your ointment, no Strom Thurmans, no Jesse Helms. You could even have your own newspaper. I’m sure there is no limit to the amount of journalists you could attract. You could sing the praises of homosexuality, abortion, animal rights and the abolition of drug laws and you could blast the evils of school vouchers and death penalties. President Gore could sponsor legislation to outlaw the internal combustion engine and the cutting of trees. Just think, the whole country could be just one big national park, your own little utopia. Yes, Mr. Baldwin, just think your own country, just the way you like it . You could call it something like Leninland and your motto could be “By hook or crook or dimpled chad we strive to meet our goals”. By the way if you do decide to buy your own country please save a place for an out of work president and his wife. Whatever you decide to do you’d better hurry, January 20th is just around the corner and “you know who” will be holding forth in the oval office and if you’re a man of your word it’s time for you to bid this horrible country adios.
What do you think?
God Bless America
Charlie DanielsRemember that MR. BALDWIN? I am now calling on you to show us, that you
can be a man of your word...although I really don't think that is the case. MR BALDWIN, there are many opportunities in this land of the "corrupt" as you put it, to get out. We are waiting MR BALDWIN. Don't you want to be a man of your word?
Actually, I really didn't think that you would be. you and all the other "flaming Liberals" in this country are too full of yourselves to keep a promise like that...but I just thought that I would remind you to get out. Like Charlie Daniels said....why don't you buy your own island....hell, instead of leninland like he suggested....why don't you make it Baldwinland. And make it kind of like a Disneyland for Liberals...
If you build it....they will come!You know that we are all waiting for you to keep your word.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 10:18 AM EDT
Tuesday, August 29, 2006
They just Won't Learn from the Past!
Mood:
d'oh
Now Playing: Will the Time finally Come when they will?
Murphy wants to Cut and Run in Iraq
"Its time to change direction in Iraq, and we need to start bringing our men and women home now."-P. Murphy-"Democrat Patrick Murphy is running in the 8th congressional district in Pennsylvania. His experience in Iraq has led him to support the
Murphy Plan for Iraq, that would start bringing troops home now......This should be a democratic seat, and Murphy is the candidate who can win it, but he needs our help." (
MoveOn.Org. email: "Deadline Tomorrow: Can You Pitch In?" 06/27/06)I say NO I will NOT!Lamont wants to Cut and Run in Iraq.
"I think it's time for us to take our front line military operations and start bringing those troops home now." -N. Lamont-
"In an election decided by 10,119 votes, MoveOn members made 77,000 calls to get Connecticut's voters to the polls and put Lamont over the top." (MoveOn.Org. email, "Victory!" 08/09/06)Victory??? I think NOT! At least NOT for America. for America, this is a move backwards to the Rennaissance, and the Crusades. Maybe MoveOn.org should change their name to MoveBack.org?Lamont also opposed the Wiretaps."I look at the illegal wiretaps....I think we should have said that was wrong.....I think the censure was a way of telling the president what you did was wrong." ("Lieberman, Lamont Spar in Connecticut Primary Debate" The Washington Post 07/07/06)Okay, okay okay..... I am sick and tired of hearing this stupid and wrong angle being forced on the public. If the Liberals would just stop for a minute (
that is all it would take) and look up what Bush did to okay those wiretaps, they would see once and for all, that it
was not done illegally. You people
DO NOT seem to realize what is at stake here.....or is it that you just don't care? If you don't care, you better have a care cause it
WILL AFFECT you too, and not in a good way. and when that happens, and you try to blame others, it
WILL NOT be believed! And as
Rush Limbaugh says, "you will be shown to all, the kind of hypocrits you really are!"
As from the above crap you can see, that MoveOn.Org has launched another inane Campaign called
"Call for change" in the swing districts. They are sending out emails that say: "Call for Change is our people powered campaign to win back congress. [On the night of August 29th] in your community, we're throwing a big party and kicking our campaign up a notch. MoveOn members will be getting together meet, eat, and call voters in critical swing districts" (
MoveOn.Org Email: "Most Fun Way to Win Back Congress Yet." 08/28/06)
MoveOn.Org. is Running False Ads Accusing GOP Representatives of Being Criminals.MoveOn.org Email: "For the Last few months we've worked together to air 'Red Handed' TV ads to get out the truth about Republicans' ties to big Corporations. The ads have been very effective.and another.....
MoveOn.Org. Email: "Taking 'Red Handed' everywhere. (07/11/06)Does having ties to Big Corporations necessarily make it illegal? NO IT DOESN'T!!! As a matter-of-fact, how about the Democrats ties to a very Liberal and Communistic and BIG idea -
ACLU, and the Labor
UNIONS?Now, I have to interject a bit of fact.... MoveOn.Org., and most Liberals (
the ones that I have repeatedly named in this blog) wouldn't know a fact, if it bit them on the Butt and gave them rabies! Their facts consist of the truth,
Spun so that it actually says something else. As I have said before.....
The truth is only the truth if it is told EXACTLY AS IT OCCURS. The Liberals, MoveOn.Org and a few others simply put,
Cannot tell the truth, even if their lives depended on it.And I am not just saying this to be flippant or funny. Look out on our history through the late 1950's, the 1960's. the 1970's, the 1980's and the 1990's. heck you could even go into the 2000's. During most of that time, you will see the Democrats, MoveOn.Org., (when they came into being) and other organizations doing what they could do to change the Moral fabric of America to something mutated and bad.....and since that wasn't bad enough...they branched out and now are doing that to the whole world.
We have gone from a nation that followed the
Law of the Land, to questioning and not following
the law of the land.We have gone from a nation that probably for the most part made
GOD smile on High, to a Nation that probably Breaks His heart, and brings a tear to His eye.
We have gone from a nation with borders, that were respected by the whole world, to a nation that has no borders, and is the target for every terrorist cell, criminal, and hoodlum in the world. Because they know that once here, they can do what they want because the
Liberals have worked hard to give them more rights than the average American Citizen.
MoveOn.Org Political Action ad campaign says:
Four House Members have been 'caught red handed', when in fact, none of the four members have done anything illegal. (www.factcheck.org) accessed 08/24/06
Because of their
Distortions, MoveOn.Org's "Red Handed" ads were recently pulled from Television stations in New Hampshire, Indiana, Ohio, Virginia and Connecticut.
(Walter Alarkon, "Anti-Bass Ads Pulled From Station Moveon.Org Criticized Him For Iraq War Votes," Concord [NH] Monitor, 8/28/06; James Wensits, "WSBT-TV Pulls Ad Slamming Chocola," South Bend [IN] Tribune, 6/9/06; "Cable Network Pulls Ad," The Associated Press, 6/8/06; Steve Stone, "Cox Communications Temporarily Pulls Ad That Attacks Drake," The [Norfolk, VA] Virginian-Pilot, 6/12/06; Mark Pazniokas, "Johnson, Murphy Feud Over Ads," Hartford Courant, 4/4/06)MoveOn.Org. has right now on their site, (08/29/06) lies that are there from Months ago -- still not removed....nor will they ever be...."
"Republicans caught 'Red Handed' (a photo is shown of a Large dump truck with the words superimposed on the photo "$18 Billion to Halliburton" (These people even when proved wrong, still can't tell the truth..) and this one is the best lil of all:
50 Ways to Love Your Country.....with intros from Gail Sheehy, Nancy Palosi, and Al Gore, with what they say is
"an inspiring collection of 50 call-to-action essays from MoveOn members."And another,
"Let's make our "Call for Change" National: Ned Lamont's victory is proof that people powered politics works. After Connecticut MoveOn members voted 85% to endorse Lamont, members like you made over 77,000 calls to help get out the vote. help us make our "Call for Change" national."Now, is this what you want? Socialism to take over the United States?
Here are some questions to ask yourself:
1. Do you like Nazism?
2. Do you endorse Communism?
3. Do you endorse Terrorism?
4. Do you endorse breaking laws, then changing them so you are no longer breaking them?
5. Are you Common Sense impaired?
If you answered yes to these, you ARE A LIBERAL. Go away. We don't like you here. you are NOT in power now...stop acting like you are.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 2:30 PM EDT
Monday, August 28, 2006
He is right....for once....but sadly...for the wrong reasons....
Mood:
a-ok
Now Playing: Al Gore: 'Democracy Is Under Attack'
Topic: Liberals Insanity
NewsMax.com posted this this morning...and I had to place my take on this stupidity that Al Gore has spouted again.....
......
Former Vice President Al Gore said Sunday ever-tighter political and economic control of the media is a major threat to democracy. Gore said the goal behind his year-old "interactive" television channel Current TV was to encourage the kind of democratic dialogue that thrives online but is increasingly rare on TV.
"Democracy is under attack," Gore told an audience at the Edinburgh International Television Festival. "Democracy as a system for self-governance is facing more serious challenges now than it has faced for a long time.
"Democracy is a conversation, and the most important role of the media is to facilitate that conversation of democracy. Now the conversation is more controlled, it is more centralized."
He said that in many countries, media control was being consolidated in the hands of a few businesspeople or politicians.Now, here is my take. Yes....Democracy
is under attack...but not in the way that Gore and the other Liberals think.
Democracy is under attack from two fronts. The Terrorist cells around the world, that want to destroy what America believes in and America too. The other front, unfortunately is here in the United States in positions of Power. And no,
I am not talking about the Republicans or President Bush.
Democracy is under attack all around the world, like this photo taken at a
"peaceful demonstration in London"This kind of thing, though the organizers of this said it was peaceful, actually were inciting violence by the placards that the people were carrying. This is
NOT peaceful by any means. It is actually the Muslem way of trying to take over the world...making everyone think it is peaceful....until we are all caught with our pants down and unable to retaliate to a full scale war.....
which is coming by the way!
Democracy is under attack by the world perceiving that the UN is a good entity, when it is actually in cahouts with Hezbollah
*who has let the world know that they wish for nothing more than world Domination and the destruction of Democratic states like Israel, and the United States.* The photo above shows their two flags flying
together over a compound in Iran.
Democracy is under attack by people like Hillary Clinton, who is Liberal to the core, but has people believing that she is more moderate and will actually Listen to what the people have to say. Just listen to her long enough and her true self will show, and you will know what I mean.
Democracy is under attack by Howard Dean. Always spouting off that the Bush Administration is wrong in everything they do. Bush *according to these looneys* helped cause all the damage in New Orleans last year when Katrina hit.
More on this later in this blog. I have a lot to say.
Democracy is under attack by John Kerry. His
wishy washy attitude about everything makes it a scary proposition that he almost became President of the United States. The same can be said about Al Gore. Both these men are complete looney tunes and should be removed from office before they finally say something right, and they are perceived as someone who should be president. John Kerrys "I voted for the war before I voted against the war" mentality is so stupid that I can't believe that anyone listens to him other than to get a few laughs. The trouble with this is.....
he is dangerous....
laughter isn't.
What we have to do as Conservatives is band together. Actually we should all read the book pictured above. It is a good read...even though scary, cause it lays out the plan that Islam has for us. If we don't get our act straight, and get it together, we are doomed. We are doomed if in November people like the ones pictured above, and others like Teddy Kennedy and Nancy Palosi aren't given the message that if they don't straighten up and stop blaming America for everything that is happening...they
WILL be out of a job soon. If not in November, then the next one they are involved in.
Democracy is under attack from so many different angles now. The photo above shows that even Europe has to watch what is going on.
Democracy is under attack, but at least we have someone in the white house that is trying to take care of this.
President Bush is a man of honor who has been slandered at every turn by the Liberals.
They do not care who they hurt with their rhetoric. They do not care how often they have to lie to get done what they feel has to be done.
Take New Orleans. Yes, I am back to that. The news over the last day has come back to the old story that Bush had the Levees in New Orleans bombed so they would fail. It is an even older story than that....if you don't know...the Federal Government back in about 1929 did bomb the levees so that a rich neighborhood wouldn't get flooded....*the downtown area*, and the result was the downtown was saved...but poor neighborhoods were flooded.
I guess the liberals figure that if it happened then, it happened now. The thing they are not saying....is that the Governor of Louisiana had the funds to fix the levees before they broke. But she earmarked the funds for something else. OH NO...! *gasp* Yes it happened...but you never hear of that in the press......
if she had been a Republican..the press wouldn't have gotten enough of the story in print!So, damnit...stop with all the Bush bashing the the Conservative bashing. Read my last post here too. It lists the blunders of a bunch of democrat presidents right in a row...but you never hear of those things either...they were all great presidents. All we ever hear in the press is: how bad the United states is....how global warming is OUR fault. How the Terrorists are victims because we are at war against them.
GROW UP YOU PEOPLE. Get a clue. Know this to be a true fact. The United States would be so much better off without the likes of
John Kerry, John Murtha, Nancy Palosi, Teddy Kennedy, Al Gore, Michael Moore, Hillary and Bill Clinton *yes I included your darlings* and a bunch more.....and no, I am not against Democrats. I like
Zell Miller. Another one that needs to have a reality check is
John McCain. Yes I mentioned a Republican. He is supposed to represent a Border state...but he is so Liberal when it comes to Illegal Immigration, we should just send him to Mexico to see how he would be treated there, as an illegal Immigrant. He wouldn't like his treatment....and wouldn't have any say of how he was treated.
I need to get these facts across to you people.
Democracy IS UNDER attack! But not from the Right....Democracy is under attack by You
Al Gore and all of the idiots who think like you do. Wake up and realize that you are destroying America. I know I don't want you to do that. I don't want America destroyed!
If you hate this country that much....then move somewhere else. Hell I probably know a bunch of Americans that would pay to get you out so you could set up shop in another country......
how about Iraq? Syria? A Hezbollah stronghold? Osama Bin Ladin?.......God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 3:49 PM EDT
Sunday, August 27, 2006
Worst President? Oh Come on....
Mood:
don't ask
Now Playing: Are they kidding?
Topic: Liberals Insanity
I just shake my head in amazement at the
stupidity of some of the
Liberals in our government.
I really can't believe how
out of touch that these people seem to be, and being so out of touch, they still don't have any clue that they are the ones that are wrong. And they want to lead our country?
Don't make me laugh!With them, when something goes wrong...it is always the fault of the Republicans....never the Democrats. Here is something they need to look at.....
Worst President??????
>
> The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter
to the editor. Please forward to all on your list as this will put
things in perspective:
>
> Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war. They
complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently claimed
Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
>
> Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try
to remember, it was started by terrorists on 9/11.
>
> Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims.
FDR (a Democrat) led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
Truman (a Democrat) finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average of 18,333 per year.
John F. Kennedy (a Democrat) started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam never attacked us.
Johnson (another Democrat) turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
Clinton (yet another Democrat) went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter three times by Sudan and did nothing. Osama has attacked us on
multiple occasions.
In the two years since terrorists attacked us, President Bush (A Republican) has liberated two countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a
shot, and captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this abroad while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
Worst president in history? Come on!Now if you read that....you will note, that now the number of American deaths has gone up to about 2,500, but still, that is less than any of the other wars.....and is only about 500 per year. If that makes Bush the worst president that we have ever had......then we need many more of the worst ones. That may save our country from the crap that you liberals have put us in over the last 40 years.
Learn from the past, celebrate our freedoms, praise our soldiers for their jobs well done, and worship the Lord in all His glory.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 11:12 AM EDT
Saturday, August 26, 2006
Hope this scares you into action....
Mood:
caffeinated
Now Playing: If Hillary Clinton wins the White house in November....
Topic: Liberals Insanity
I just finished up a poll on one of the Conservative sites I belong to, and the results were scary....to say the least.
The question was: If
Hillary Clinton became president, who would she choose as a running mate? The poll had,
John Kerry, Chuck Schumer, John Edwards, and
Nancy Palosi. Most people chose
Nancy Palosi. Can you imagine the
Chaos that would ensue if the white house had President Hillary Clinton and Vice President Nancy Palosi?
At least John Kerry didn't get any votes.
Now don't get me wrong. I don't think that a woman in the white house would be a bad thing....but to have Hillary and Nancy would be a disaster.
Total and complete.I think that
Condolezza Rice would make a good president, but the problem is, the good people don't want to be president. Seems they are too smart for that.
Bill also would love to have his wife back in the White House cause they would be "home" again. When Bill was president, Hillary thought she was too. So it goes to figure, that if Hillary wins...Bill will too. We hear from those two enough as it is.
We need to band together, and get everyone out to vote
Republican in November. I know that a lot of you are not happy with
Bush, but he can't run again in November. The
Republican has to be someone else. Please don't let us hear after the Election that Hillary Clinton is the new president. This country would be in trouble if it happens.
Vote
Republican....but
don't vote often. *ss*
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 8:35 AM EDT
Friday, August 25, 2006
Israel had to fight....
Mood:
bright
Now Playing: There was no other way....
The picture is of the Hezbollah flag,
flying on the Lebanon side of the border to Israel. Hezbollah, a Terror group that was essentially started by Syria and Iraq, and funded by them, is a direct threat to the national security of Israel.
Israel is surrounded by neighbors that would like nothing more than to wipe Her off the map. Extinction is a very moving motive to survive. And Israel has it.
We don'tMahmoud Ahmadinejad, the sixth president of Iran has called for the destruction of Israel, saying it "should be wiped off the map."
With neighbors like that, it is small wonder why Israel reacted the way they did. And it is
amazingly stupid that the world condemned Her for doing so.
Israel,
unlike the Liberals in this country, have a strong will to keep their country alive. I still feel, that they would have won the war against Hezbollah if the world and the Libs would have kept their
damned noses out of it, and actually offered help instead of condemnation. The world and the Liberals on this should be totally ashamed of themselves.
They took the basic right to defend yourself, and took it away from Israel. Israel
will have to go back to war in the future on this unresolved issue with Hezbollah, and because they gave up this time, it won't be pretty for either side next time and Israel will have to fight for their very existance and maybe not win because of it.
Israel didn't lose the war,
the world and the Liberals lost it for them. And it will be to
Israel's probable demise that this happened. I hope that the Libs are happy. They have shoveled another people towards the road to extinction.
God Bless America
God Bless Israel
God forgive the Libs......
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 6:33 AM EDT
Thursday, August 24, 2006
The Ways to destroy the United States......
Now Playing: We have had some of this done already....
Topic: Liberals Insanity
America, is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within.”... Joseph StalinThat quote was made by Joseph Stalin....and to think of it, it is pretty scary...cause the Terrorists and their cells have started that very plan.
Our
Morality used to be something that we could all hang our hats on. But anymore, a Moral America is something that has been thrown to the wayside, and into the gutter.
Number one on stalin's plan for destroying America has happened. Only a very few anymore care if the laws are enforced, or if sin isn't committed, or.....well you get the idea.Our
Patriotism is still strong, but it is under attack by the Liberal left in this country. And they have done much to destroy the patriotism that was in this country during the Vietnam war. By having the media side with them in destroying our ability to win that war. The media only told the bad things that were happening over there. (
recognise a pattern here?)
We were winning the Vietnam war, but the public perceived we weren't, because of the media...so we ended up pulling out and losing it. With the war against
terror that we are now fighting, you see the press only reporting the things that are bad for the United States. The moral of our troops is high...but if you followed only the press...you would think just the opposite. Exactly what the Liberals and their press is trying to make happen.
Hence the destroying of Patriotism It hasn't happened yet...but it is ongoing, and will happen if we don't stop it.
Our
spiritual life is being destroyed by the Liberals, when they pass laws to make Abortions legal, making gay marriages legal....doing everything that the
Lord considers bad....taking the Ten Commandments out of society, trying to take
In God We Trust off of our money and anything else that is public. The
ACLU (
the right hand of the branch of the Liberal Goverment) saying that a Cross that has been on a hill outside of San Diego since 1954 has to be taken down because it offends one or two people!. You see the spirituality of this country going down the tubes? We are letting it happen, though I have to say, we did win that battle. The cross stayed!
All three of the things that Stalin said had to be taken out to make America collapse is being done, and the Conservatives are letting it happen for the most part.
We need to band together and stop this destructive trend from going any farther. It is a well known fact that 75% of Americans believe in God......
So why are we letting a minority of us push God out of our lives?It is a well known fact that the majority of Americans believe in a Moral and Righteous Life......
So why are we letting one or two people who say they are offended when God is petitioned in prayer publically, and letting them succeed in making that go away? I don't understand this way of thinking. We have a wonderful country here, but we are letting the Liberals and the spineless Conservatives destroy it. We are letting People like
Teddy Kennedy, and
John Kerry and
Hillary Clinton spout their lies on television, (
which we all know is Liberal to the bone) so everyone has to listen to their crap.
We need to get these people out of office...and get this country back to the Moral and Decent Country that my Father fought for.....the country that my generation tried to fight for in Vietnam, but couldn't because the Liberal Machine was working against us.
We
have to get our country back. Terrorists and
Liberals are out to steal it .... we can't let them. We
HAVE to stop them. NOW!!!
God Bless America
God Bless Israel
God Bless us all
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 6:32 PM EDT
Updated: Thursday, August 24, 2006 8:02 PM EDT
Today's blog entry is more of a celebration...
Mood:
a-ok
Now Playing: I was finally accepted....
Yes, today I am going away from the Liberal Lies exposing that I have devoted this blog too since it's inception in December of 2005.
The web site that is involved with this blog has been activated since before that, but in December I decided that I could use my talents in writing by exposing the Lies and white tales told by the Liberals in our government.
But today, I found out that after submitting this blog to Blog Explosion several times, and several times getting denied acceptance, this morning I got the acceptance email saying that I was accepted into http://www.blogexplosion.com
It is a good day, as I have started setting up RSS with this blog, and probably with the web site involved intricately with this blog, as both do their best to expose the hypocrisy of the Liberals and the impossibility of it succeeding.
I thank you BlogExplosion for accepting this blog into your fold.
Back soon with the next installment of exposing the Liberals lies and rhetoric....with the only reason for being to get back into power to continue destroying the integrity of this great country.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 9:51 AM EDT
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
This is too Good to passup.....
Mood:
bright
Now Playing: From a blog identified only as
Topic: Liberals Insanity
I wish that I could take credit for this little gem, but it is an entry from a blog that was signed only as "ronkibo." Not sure where it came from. I got it from the Reagan/Bush Conservatives site at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/reagan_bushconservatives/ and it is very worth repeating...and sending out.:
How To Negotiate With Terrorists
This brief blog entry takes you through a series of
negotiations over time between peacemakers and
terrorists:
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of a line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker introduces himself. The terrorist kills
him.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker asks, "why did you kill my friend?" The
terrorist kills him and rapes his wife.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker says, "Stop that!" The terrorist kills him,
rapes his daughter and kills his wife.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker says, "I'll pay you $1000 if you stop
attacking us." The terrorist agrees to the deal, takes
the $1000, and kills him.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker appeals to the United Nations. The United
Nations says the peacemaker is at fault. The terrorist
kills him.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker now has a gun, and threatens to use it.
Other peacemakers start chanting the old 60's whine,
"Can't we all just get along?" The peacemaker
hesitates. The terrorist kills him.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker tries to convince his peacemaker friends
that the terrorists aren't going to respond to
negotiations, but they insist that if he kills the
terrorist it'll just make the other terrorists mad.
The peacemaker reluctantly agrees to try negotiating
again. The terrorist kills him., his entire family,
and his neighbor's family.
A heated debate now ensues between the peacemakers who
want to be nice to the terrorists and the peacemakers
who believe that there can never be peace until the
terrorists are all dead. While they are debating, the
terrorists kill 15 more peacemakers.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker asks himself, "Which is more important: being liked by everyone,
or protecting my family?" The
terrorist pulls a knife to kill the peacemaker, but
the peacemaker pulls a gun and kills the terrorist
first. The United Nations condemns the peacemaker's
use of unproportional force. Many of his peacemaker
friends turn against him.
A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A
terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The
peacemaker apologizes for what his friend did to the
other terrorist. The terrorist kills him, his entire
family and his neighbors, and threatens to destroy the
city as soon as they develop a bigger weapon.
A peacemaker refuses to meet at the line because every time a peacemaker goes to the line the terrorist kills
him. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the
line and fires rockets into the peacemaker's town. The
United Nations condemns the way the peacemaker
provoked the terrorist by refusing to come to the line
and meet with him.
Generations pass and not much changes until one day
when the son of a peacemaker decides that the old
strategy simply won't work. He walks up to the left
side of the line a little early. As the terrorist
approaches the right side of the line the peacemaker
shoots him. Another terrorist approaches to replace
the first, and the peacemaker shoots him too. This
scene plays out several more times. Then a terrorist
approaches carrying a white flag, but he also has
weapons. The peacemaker shoots him. A terrorist next
approaches with a ceasefire resolution from the U.N.
The peacemaker shoots him also. A large group of
terrorists approach and the peacemaker shoots them all
and drops a nuclear bomb on the city they came from.
The peacemaker continues killing the terrorists until
the terrorists are all dead.
There is finally peace on earth and the United Nations
takes the credit.
(No peacemakers or terrorists were harmed during the
writing of this blog.)
I have to say, this is a lyrical story, though, if you watch what is happening in the story, then look back on what has been happening in Israel for the last bunch of generations, you will see the same thing happening. If you watch the stuff happening with the United States since September 11, 2001, you can see the same things happening there too. How much of this crap do we have to put up with before the UN and the Liberal Politicians stop their cowardice and start realizing that the best thing to do is what the peacemaker finally did? Don't you people realize that this
HAS TO BE DONE eventually? Lets all hope that it's not too late when you do realize it.
God Bless America
God Bless Israel
God Bless our dwindling allies.....
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 10:21 AM EDT
Amnesty Internation is a joke.....
Mood:
irritated
Now Playing: They Accuse Israel of War Crimes....
Topic: Liberals Insanity
August 22, 2006 -
This is a travesty. Israel should be angry at the response to them. They were the ones who had this brought to them.....not the other way around. GIVE ME A BREAK. Start using your brains people......if that is even possible anymore...... LONDON — Amnesty International on Wednesday accused Israel of war crimes, saying it broke international law by deliberately destroying Lebanon's civilian infrastructure during its recent war with Hezbollah guerrillas. The human rights group said initial evidence, including the pattern and scope of the Israeli attacks, number of civilian casualties, widespread damage and statements by Israeli officials "indicate that such destruction was deliberate and part of a military strategy, rather than 'collateral damage."'
Amnesty International, whose delegates monitored the fighting in both Israel and Lebanon, said Israel violated international laws banning direct attacks on civilians and barring indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks. "The scale of the destruction was just extraordinary," said Amnesty researcher Donatella Rovera, who visited Lebanon during the war and co-authored the report.
CountryWatch: Israel | Lebanon | Syria |
Iran "There is clear evidence of disproportionate and indiscriminate attacks." The group urged the United Nations to look into whether both combatants, Israel and Hezbollah, broke international law.
Amnesty International said it would address Hezbollah's attacks on Israel separately. Mark Regev, a spokesman for Israel's Foreign Ministry, said his country acted legally. "Israel's actions in Lebanon were in accordance with recognized norms of behavior during conflicts and with relevant international law," he said. "Unlike Hezbollah, we did not deliberately target the Lebanese civilian population. On the contrary, under very difficult circumstances, we tried to be as surgical as is humanly possible in targeting the Hezbollah terrorist organization."
Regev said that Lebanese infrastructure was "targeted only when that infrastructure was being exploited by the Hezbollah machine, and this is in accordance with the rules of war."
Israel suffered international condemnation when it attacked targets in southern Lebanon hours after Hezbollah guerrillas operating there killed three Israeli soldiers and captured two in a cross-border raid July 12.
The Israeli Defense Force has said that between that raid and the Aug. 14 U.N.-brokered cease-fire, it launched more than 7,000 air attacks on Lebanese targets and the navy conducted about 2,500 bombardments.
The United Nations children's fund, UNICEF, estimates that some 1,183 people died, mostly civilians and about a third of them children, while the Lebanese Higher Relief Council says 4,054 people were injured and 970,000 displaced. U.N. officials reported that around 15,000 civilian homes were destroyed.This world is sick. People who are attacked are blamed for the war that ensues.....Countrys that try to enforce their laws on immigration are told that is immoral to do so.....Politicians listen to fake trumped up polls to rule the land with......News Media doctors photos and news stories to say something different than actually happens.....
The world needs to realize, that the concept of right and wrong, though changing in the eyes of mankind, does not change. It never has. Liberals have to learn this fact....and a fact it is. A fact that will NEVER change. The world is
SICK SICK SICK. Lets get back to the basics.
Right is Right....
wrong is wrong....those things never change in
God's eyes...they shouldn't change in ours...cause when they do....we turn against
God.
God Bless America
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 8:15 AM EDT
Tuesday, August 22, 2006
president Bush talks......
Mood:
chatty
Now Playing: There are things left out here......
WASHINGTON — President Bush said Monday the United States is already helping on the ground in Lebanon ahead of an international peacekeeping force to make sure that people can return to their homes following the armed conflict with Israel and Hezbollah militants. To me, this is wrong. We must....and I repeat this, WE MUST stop Hezbollah, by destroying it’s ability to make war. The UN is ignoring this fact. But a fact it is. And a fact it will remain. One that will not be ignored. If the UN continues to ignore it, then Hezbollah will re-build, re-arm and start the fight again when they feel they are ready to do it. Then we will be hard pressed to stop it!
Bush said the United States is making a commitment to help the U.N.-sanctioned international force, whose composition has yet to be determined, with logistics support, command and control, communications and intelligence. "We will also work with the leadership in the international force, once it's identified, to ensure that the United States is doing all we can to make this mission a success," Bush told reporters in the White House Conference Center briefing room. I still say this is wrong. You can’t win, if you don’t stop the enemy. And we haven't! He said the United States has already offered active assistance in the form of diplomacy as well as cash and humanitarian aid, including 20,000 tons of wheat and $230 million in assistance. The president said $25 million of that pledge has been spent on rebuilding already.
(What about sending aid and helping to rebuild the real victim in this. Israel? Where is the help there?)
In addition, Bush said reopening the Beirut airport to passenger and humanitarian aid flights and ensuring a steady fuel supply for Lebanese power plants and automobiles are high priorities.
Bush said other priorities include tapping into the private sector to find ways to help people rebuild their homes, rehabilitating schools before the new school year begins, cleaning up an oil slick near coastal communities and proposing a $42 million package to help train and equip Lebanon's armed forces.
(Okay, now he gets to the meat of the matter...but is it enough?)
"I'll also work closely with Congress to extend the availability of loan guarantees to help rebuild infrastructure in Israel, infrastructure damaged by Hezbollah's rockets," Bush said. Bush said U.N. Resolution 1701 authorizes an international force of 15,000 to deploy to Lebanon alongside 15,000 Lebanese troops to give displaced people there and in Israel "the confidence to return to their homes." U.N. officials had hoped to put 3,500 troops on the ground by next Monday, but so far, no European countries have stepped up with a large contribution of forces.
Over the weekend, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert said his country would not permit peacekeepers from nations that do not have diplomatic ties to Israel, including Indonesia, Malaysia and Bangladesh, which offered the most troops. France, which commands the existing U.N. peacekeeping force in Lebanon known as UNIFIL, (you remember from another post in my blog that the UNIFIL and Hezbollah are buddies....with photos of their flags flying together as proof) had been expected to make a significant new contribution that would form the backbone of the expanded force.
But President Jacques Chirac disappointed the international body and other countries last week by merely doubling France's contingent of 200 troops. "I would hope that they would put more troops in," Bush said of France's commitment. (Is he kidding? France is a coward! How often do they have to prove that point?)
"An international force requires an international commitment," Bush said. "Previous resolutions have failed in Lebanon because they were not implemented by the international community and did not prevent Hezbollah and its sponsors" from building up in the region. But he said another resolution for a peacekeeping force will be developed in the U.N. Security Council. Later, U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said a new Security Council resolution could help break the impasse over getting an expanded U.N. force on the ground quickly, outline actions for disarming Hezbollah and clear up questions about the rules of engagement. "I think the initial force can be deployed now," Bolton told reporters. "We want the disarming of Hezbollah to be accomplished rapidly so that the democratically elected government of Lebanon can establish full control over its territory." Bush, who held his last presidential press conference July 7 in Chicago, returned from Camp David on Sunday.
He spoke on Lebanon, Iran and Iraq, three areas of instability. He said if the new government fails in Iraq, the country could become a "safe haven for terrorists and extremists." "I hear a lot of talk about civil war. I'm concerned about that, of course, and I've talked to a lot of people about it. And what I've found from my talks are that the Iraqis want a unified country. And that the Iraqi leadership is determined to thwart the efforts of the extremists and the radicals and Al Qaeda,"
Bush said. "The strategy is to help the Iraqi people achieve their objectives and their dreams, which is a democratic society. ... We're not leaving so long as I'm the president. That would be a huge mistake. It would send an unbelievably terrible signal to reformers across the region. It would say we've abandoned our desire to change the conditions that create terror," Bush said. Using much of the same terminology he applied to Lebanon, Bush said the Iraqi people want freedom, a political solution to the violence, security, reconciliation and rehabilitation. An estimated 3,500 Iraqis died in insurgent attacks and bombings in the country last month.
To help the Iraqi government achieve security, Bush said he has given commanders "all the flexibility they need" to change their tactics to thwart insurgents. He said the Stryker Brigade has also been moved from Mosul to Baghdad. "One thing is clear: The Iraqi people are showing incredible courage.
The United States of America must understand that it's in our interests that we help this democracy succeed. As a matter of fact, it's in our interests that we help reformers across the Middle East achieve their objectives. This is the fundamental challenge of the 21st century," Bush said.
In response, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi issued a statement criticizing the president for not developing a contingency plan for a failed state before sending U.S. forces there. "Our troops have been fighting in Iraq longer than we fought in Europe in World War II. (Is this woman insane or just stupid?)
The president's promise to keep American forces in Iraq as long as he is in office is no substitute for an effective plan to complete the mission," Pelosi, D-Calif., said. "Democrats believe it's time for a new direction in Iraq, with responsible redeployment of U.S. forces from Iraq that begins this year." Bush conceded that the situation in Iraq has become a tool for debate in the usually local issues-dominated midterm congressional elections.
"There are a lot of good decent people saying 'get out now. Vote for me, I'll do everything I can to cut off money. ...' It's a big mistake. It would be wrong, in my judgment, to leave before the mission is completed in Iraq." But the president said he's not getting involved in the Senate race in Connecticut, where Sen. Joe Lieberman has launched an independent bid for his seat after losing the Democratic primary to Ned Lamont, a fierce opponent of the Iraq war.
Republican Alan Schlesinger is also running. "I'm staying out of Connecticut" on the advice of the national Republican Party leaders, he said, adding that if he were a candidate right now, he'd be talking up the economy. Bush was speaking to reporters in advance of Tuesday, the date set by the Iranian president for Tehran to give a formal response to an offer by six nations, including the United States to provide economic incentives to Iran if it freezes its nuclear program. With an expectation, reinforced Monday by Iran's supreme leader that Tehran will reject the package, the White House has indicated it will move quickly to ask for international sanctions on the Islamic Republic if it does not suspend its nuclear enrichment. The United Nations has set an Aug. 31 deadline for that activity to end. But Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is quoted on Iranian state television Monday as saying, "The Islamic Republic of Iran has made its own decision, and in the nuclear case, God willing, with patience and power, will continue its path."
Meanwhile, Iran continued its large-scale military maneuvers this weekend. According to Iran's state-run media, the Iranian military on Sunday fired 10 Thunderbolt surface-to-surface missiles that can travel 50 to 150 miles. Asked about the destabilizing role Iran has played in the region, both in Iraq and Lebanon, Bush said, "The final history in the region has yet to be written. "Iran is obviously part of the problem. They sponsor Hezbollah. They encourage a radical brand of Islam. Imagine how difficult this issue would be if Iran had a nuclear weapon," Bush said.Okay.....so I stayed silent in the last part of the story...but through the first part, you get the message. I do not think that this is going to work, and no matter how good President Bush’s intentions are here, the one main problem still exists. And that is the Terrorist cells that the UN refuses to acknowledge, Hezbollah, Al-Qeada, Bin Ladin, and Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has publically stated that he will not help....
Do we have a choice? I think not. America’s security is at risk, as is the security of every democratic nation in the world.....starting with Israel.
We have to do something. We have to destroy Hezbollah’s ability to make war....cause they will use it....soon. Mark my words. They will use it. And once Israel is out of the way....we are next. So if you wish to keep pussyfooting around....get ready for the attack....cause it is coming. God Bless America
God Bless Israel
God Bless all God fearing People....
-Robert-
Posted by Robert Garding
at 12:32 PM EDT
Newer | Latest | Older
